From: Calvin Owens <calvinow...@fb.com>

Since the code explicilty falls back to a smaller allocation when the
large one fails, we shouldn't complain when that happens.

Signed-off-by: Calvin Owens <calvinow...@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pa...@netfilter.org>
---
 net/netfilter/nfnetlink_log.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_log.c b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_log.c
index eb086a192c5a..7435505037b7 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_log.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_log.c
@@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ nfulnl_alloc_skb(struct net *net, u32 peer_portid, unsigned 
int inst_size,
         * message.  WARNING: has to be <= 128k due to slab restrictions */
 
        n = max(inst_size, pkt_size);
-       skb = alloc_skb(n, GFP_ATOMIC);
+       skb = alloc_skb(n, GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN);
        if (!skb) {
                if (n > pkt_size) {
                        /* try to allocate only as much as we need for current
-- 
2.1.4

Reply via email to