On 2018/4/11 22:26, David Miller wrote:
From: Jia-Ju Bai
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 16:20:22 +0800
Okay, I now know why many of my patches were not replied.
Many of your patches are not responded to because you handle patch
feedback poorly sometimes.
Okay, thanks for pointing it out.
I will h
From: Jia-Ju Bai
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 16:20:22 +0800
> Okay, I now know why many of my patches were not replied.
Many of your patches are not responded to because you handle patch
feedback poorly sometimes.
Also, all of your networking submissions have been dropped because
the net-next tree i
On 2018/4/11 16:17, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 04:11:00PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
On 2018/4/11 16:03, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 03:17:10PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
On 2018/4/11 14:41, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 09:29:34AM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
stir
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 04:11:00PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
>
>
> On 2018/4/11 16:03, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 03:17:10PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> > >
> > > On 2018/4/11 14:41, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 09:29:34AM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> > > > > stir42
On 2018/4/11 16:03, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 03:17:10PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
On 2018/4/11 14:41, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 09:29:34AM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
stir421x_fw_upload() is never called in atomic context.
The call chain ending up at stir421x_fw_uplo
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 03:17:10PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
>
>
> On 2018/4/11 14:41, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 09:29:34AM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> > > stir421x_fw_upload() is never called in atomic context.
> > >
> > > The call chain ending up at stir421x_fw_upload() is:
> >
On 2018/4/11 14:41, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 09:29:34AM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
stir421x_fw_upload() is never called in atomic context.
The call chain ending up at stir421x_fw_upload() is:
[1] stir421x_fw_upload() <- stir421x_patch_device() <- irda_usb_probe()
irda_usb_probe()
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 09:29:34AM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> stir421x_fw_upload() is never called in atomic context.
>
> The call chain ending up at stir421x_fw_upload() is:
> [1] stir421x_fw_upload() <- stir421x_patch_device() <- irda_usb_probe()
>
> irda_usb_probe() is set as ".probe" in struc
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 09:29:34AM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> stir421x_fw_upload() is never called in atomic context.
>
> The call chain ending up at stir421x_fw_upload() is:
> [1] stir421x_fw_upload() <- stir421x_patch_device() <- irda_usb_probe()
>
> irda_usb_probe() is set as ".probe" in struc
stir421x_fw_upload() is never called in atomic context.
The call chain ending up at stir421x_fw_upload() is:
[1] stir421x_fw_upload() <- stir421x_patch_device() <- irda_usb_probe()
irda_usb_probe() is set as ".probe" in struct usb_driver.
This function is not called in atomic context.
Despite ne
10 matches
Mail list logo