From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 09:44:54 +0200
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 01:05:51PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Christoph Hellwig
>> Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 16:02:10 +0200
>>
>> > We never use RCU protection for it, just a lot of cargo-cult
>> > rcu_deference_protects
On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 01:05:51PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Christoph Hellwig
> Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 16:02:10 +0200
>
> > We never use RCU protection for it, just a lot of cargo-cult
> > rcu_deference_protects calls.
> >
> > Note that we do keep the kfree_rcu call for it, as the
From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 16:02:10 +0200
> We never use RCU protection for it, just a lot of cargo-cult
> rcu_deference_protects calls.
>
> Note that we do keep the kfree_rcu call for it, as the references through
> struct sock are RCU protected and thus might require a
We never use RCU protection for it, just a lot of cargo-cult
rcu_deference_protects calls.
Note that we do keep the kfree_rcu call for it, as the references through
struct sock are RCU protected and thus might require a grace period before
freeing.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
---
