Hi Evgeniy,
Evgeniy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07/23/2007 04:18:26 PM:
> > static void ipoib_ib_handle_tx_wc(struct net_device *dev, struct ib_wc
*wc)
> > {
> > struct ipoib_dev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> > + int i = 0, num_completions;
> > + int tx_ring_index = priv->t
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 02:36:49PM +0530, Krishna Kumar ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> diff -ruNp org/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ib.c
> rev2/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ib.c
> --- org/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ib.c 2007-07-20
> 07:49:28.0 +0530
> +++ rev2/driv
Hi Micheal,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07/22/2007 03:11:36
PM:
> > + /*
> > +* Handle skbs completion from tx_tail to wr_id. It is possible to
> > +* handle WC's from earlier post_sends (possible multiple) in this
> > +* iteration as we move from tx_tail to wr
> + /*
> + * Handle skbs completion from tx_tail to wr_id. It is possible to
> + * handle WC's from earlier post_sends (possible multiple) in this
> + * iteration as we move from tx_tail to wr_id, since if the last
> + * WR (which is the one which had a completion request) f
diff -ruNp org/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ib.c
rev2/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ib.c
--- org/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ib.c 2007-07-20 07:49:28.0
+0530
+++ rev2/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ib.c2007-07-22
00:08:37.0 +0530
@@ -242,8 +242,9 @@
