To be honest, I'm not too sure how the reord stuff works in the
first place but this seems necessary.

When FRTO has been active, the one and only retransmission could
be unnecessary but the state and sending order might not be what
the sacktag code expects it to be (to work correctly).

Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c |    3 ++-
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
index 5d935b1..356de02 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -1224,7 +1224,8 @@ tcp_sacktag_write_queue(struct sock *sk,
 
        tp->left_out = tp->sacked_out + tp->lost_out;
 
-       if ((reord < tp->fackets_out) && icsk->icsk_ca_state != TCP_CA_Loss)
+       if ((reord < tp->fackets_out) && icsk->icsk_ca_state != TCP_CA_Loss &&
+           (tp->frto_highmark && after(tp->snd_una, tp->frto_highmark)))
                tcp_update_reordering(sk, ((tp->fackets_out + 1) - reord), 0);
 
 #if FASTRETRANS_DEBUG > 0
-- 
1.4.2

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to