Denis V. Lunev wrote:
Daniel Lezcano wrote:
Denis V. Lunev wrote:
I could hardly imagine why sombady needs to assign 0.0.0.0 as an
interface
address or interface destination address. The kernel will behave in a
strage
way in several places if this is possible, as ifa_local != 0 is
considered
Denis V. Lunev wrote:
I could hardly imagine why sombady needs to assign 0.0.0.0 as an interface
address or interface destination address. The kernel will behave in a strage
way in several places if this is possible, as ifa_local != 0 is considered
as initialized/non-initialized state of the
I could hardly imagine why sombady needs to assign 0.0.0.0 as an interface
address or interface destination address. The kernel will behave in a strage
way in several places if this is possible, as ifa_local != 0 is considered
as initialized/non-initialized state of the ifa.
Signed-off-by: Denis
Daniel Lezcano wrote:
Denis V. Lunev wrote:
I could hardly imagine why sombady needs to assign 0.0.0.0 as an
interface
address or interface destination address. The kernel will behave in a
strage
way in several places if this is possible, as ifa_local != 0 is
considered
as
Denis V. Lunev wrote:
Daniel Lezcano wrote:
Denis V. Lunev wrote:
I could hardly imagine why sombady needs to assign 0.0.0.0 as an
interface
address or interface destination address. The kernel will behave in a
strage
way in several places if this is possible, as ifa_local != 0 is
considered
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:51:59 +0300
Denis V. Lunev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I could hardly imagine why sombady needs to assign 0.0.0.0 as an interface
address or interface destination address. The kernel will behave in a strage
way in several places if this is possible, as ifa_local != 0 is
Daniel Lezcano wrote:
Denis V. Lunev wrote:
Daniel Lezcano wrote:
Denis V. Lunev wrote:
I could hardly imagine why sombady needs to assign 0.0.0.0 as an
interface
address or interface destination address. The kernel will behave in a
strage
way in several places if this is possible, as
Denis V. Lunev wrote:
Daniel Lezcano wrote:
Denis V. Lunev wrote:
Daniel Lezcano wrote:
Denis V. Lunev wrote:
I could hardly imagine why sombady needs to assign 0.0.0.0 as an
interface
address or interface destination address. The kernel will behave in a
strage
way in several places if this
