On 06/29/2015 12:50 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
On 06/18/2015 06:20 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Needs more testing. Anyone see anything wrong with this?
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com
---
drivers/net/macvtap.c | 2 +-
drivers/net/tun.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2
On 06/18/2015 06:20 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Needs more testing. Anyone see anything wrong with this?
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com
---
drivers/net/macvtap.c | 2 +-
drivers/net/tun.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:54:44PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
Am 18.06.2015 um 12:20 schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
Needs more testing. Anyone see anything wrong with this?
Can you explain the motivation?
FWIW, basic networking between two guest over macvtap still
seems to work on
Needs more testing. Anyone see anything wrong with this?
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com
---
drivers/net/macvtap.c | 2 +-
drivers/net/tun.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/macvtap.c b/drivers/net/macvtap.c
index
Am 18.06.2015 um 12:20 schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
Needs more testing. Anyone see anything wrong with this?
Can you explain the motivation?
FWIW, basic networking between two guest over macvtap still
seems to work on s390 so I dont see any obvious regression.
Christian
Signed-off-by: