On 4/28/15 10:23 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Tue, 2015-04-28 at 19:11 -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
Hi,
there were many requests for performance numbers in the past, but not
everyone has access to 10/40G nics and we need a common way to talk
about RX path performance without overhead of
Hi,
there were many requests for performance numbers in the past, but not
everyone has access to 10/40G nics and we need a common way to talk
about RX path performance without overhead of driver RX. That's
especially important when making changes to netif_receive_skb.
One would think that using
On Tue, 2015-04-28 at 19:11 -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
Hi,
there were many requests for performance numbers in the past, but not
everyone has access to 10/40G nics and we need a common way to talk
about RX path performance without overhead of driver RX. That's
especially important
