On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 15:41:35 -0700
David Ahern wrote:
> Support was recently added for device filters. The intent was to allow
> the device to be specified by name or index, and using the if%u format
> (dev == if5) or the simpler and more intuitive index alone (dev ==
Support was recently added for device filters. The intent was to allow
the device to be specified by name or index, and using the if%u format
(dev == if5) or the simpler and more intuitive index alone (dev == 5).
The latter case is broken since the index is not saved to the filter
after the
On 7/15/16 12:53 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 09:29:28 -0700
David Ahern wrote:
Support was recently added for device filters. The intent was to allow
the device to be specified by name or index, and using the if%u format
(dev == if5) or the
On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 09:29:28 -0700
David Ahern wrote:
> Support was recently added for device filters. The intent was to allow
> the device to be specified by name or index, and using the if%u format
> (dev == if5) or the simpler and more intuitive index alone (dev ==
Support was recently added for device filters. The intent was to allow
the device to be specified by name or index, and using the if%u format
(dev == if5) or the simpler and more intuitive index alone (dev == 5).
The latter case is broken since the index is not saved to the filter
after the