On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 6:14 AM wrote:
>
> > BTW, removing the FCS also means GRO is going to work, finally on this NIC
> > ;)
> >
> > GRO does not like packets with padding.
>
> As a follow-up, I am seeing hw csum failures on Sun V440 that has
> onboard Sun Cassini with sungem driver. First
> BTW, removing the FCS also means GRO is going to work, finally on this NIC ;)
>
> GRO does not like packets with padding.
As a follow-up, I am seeing hw csum failures on Sun V440 that has
onboard Sun Cassini with sungem driver. First tested version was 4.18
(it happened there once) and now
On 06/19/2018 10:30 PM, David Miller wrote:
> Tested-by: Andreas Schwab
>
> Applied and queued up for -stable, thanks Eric.
>
BTW, removing the FCS also means GRO is going to work, finally on this NIC ;)
GRO does not like packets with padding.
On 06/20/2018 04:22 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Thanks for the stable tag.
>
> IMHO the commit message should have also reference commit 7ce5a27f2ef8
> ("Revert "net: Handle CHECKSUM_COMPLETE more adequately in
> pskb_trim_rcsum().""). Which means that commit 88078d98d1bb ("net:
>
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 7:31 AM David Miller wrote:
>
> From: Eric Dumazet
> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 19:18:50 -0700
>
> > After commit 88078d98d1bb ("net: pskb_trim_rcsum() and CHECKSUM_COMPLETE
> > are friends"), sungem owners reported the infamous "eth0: hw csum failure"
> > message.
> >
> >
From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 19:18:50 -0700
> After commit 88078d98d1bb ("net: pskb_trim_rcsum() and CHECKSUM_COMPLETE
> are friends"), sungem owners reported the infamous "eth0: hw csum failure"
> message.
>
> CHECKSUM_COMPLETE has in fact never worked for this driver, but this
>
After commit 88078d98d1bb ("net: pskb_trim_rcsum() and CHECKSUM_COMPLETE
are friends"), sungem owners reported the infamous "eth0: hw csum failure"
message.
CHECKSUM_COMPLETE has in fact never worked for this driver, but this
was masked by the fact that upper stacks had to strip the FCS, and
