Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
>Hello Alex,
>
>On Mon, Oct 26, 2015, at 16:52, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>> Seems like this code isn't quite correct. You are calling ipv6_add_dev
>> for slave devices, and if I understand things correctly I don't believe
>> that was
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015, at 20:16, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
>
> >Hello Alex,
> >
> >On Mon, Oct 26, 2015, at 16:52, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> >> Seems like this code isn't quite correct. You are calling ipv6_add_dev
> >> for slave devices,
On 10/26/2015 01:45 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015, at 20:16, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
Hello Alex,
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015, at 16:52, Alexander Duyck wrote:
Seems like this code isn't quite correct. You are calling
Hi Alex,
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015, at 18:07, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> Might be a bit longer. I just realized that I think there is another
> bug here where you are going through the NETDEV_UP path even though the
> interface isn't up. I'll run through some testing this morning to work
> out the
Take into consideration that the interface might be disabled for IPv6,
thus switch event type.
Signed-off-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa
---
net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 7 +--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
Hi Alex,
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015, at 16:52, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On 10/26/2015 07:36 AM, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> > Take into consideration that the interface might be disabled for IPv6,
> > thus switch event type.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa
> >
On 10/26/2015 07:36 AM, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
Take into consideration that the interface might be disabled for IPv6,
thus switch event type.
Signed-off-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa
---
net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 7 +--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2
Hi Alex,
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015, at 18:07, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> >> Seems like this code isn't quite correct. You are calling ipv6_add_dev
> >> for slave devices, and if I understand things correctly I don't believe
> >> that was happening before and may be an unintended side effect.
> > Hmm,
Hello Alex,
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015, at 16:52, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> Seems like this code isn't quite correct. You are calling ipv6_add_dev
> for slave devices, and if I understand things correctly I don't believe
> that was happening before and may be an unintended side effect.
Ah, btw.,
On 10/26/2015 09:05 AM, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
Hi Alex,
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015, at 16:52, Alexander Duyck wrote:
On 10/26/2015 07:36 AM, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
Take into consideration that the interface might be disabled for IPv6,
thus switch event type.
Signed-off-by: Hannes
10 matches
Mail list logo