RE: [PATCH net-next] net, cgroup: cgroup_sk_updat_lock was missing initializer

2015-12-14 Thread Dexuan Cui
w-carit.de; > nhor...@tuxdriver.com; lize...@huawei.com; han...@cmpxchg.org; > netdev@vger.kernel.org; netfilter-de...@vger.kernel.org; > coret...@netfilter.org; cgro...@vger.kernel.org; linux- > ker...@vger.kernel.org; kernel-t...@fb.com; nin...@fb.com > Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net, cgroup:

Re: [PATCH net-next] net, cgroup: cgroup_sk_updat_lock was missing initializer

2015-12-14 Thread David Miller
From: Tejun Heo Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 11:24:06 -0500 > bd1060a1d671 ("sock, cgroup: add sock->sk_cgroup") added global > spinlock cgroup_sk_update_lock but erroneously skipped initializer > leading to uninitialized spinlock warning. Fix it by using > DEFINE_SPINLOCK(). > > Signed-off-by: Tejun

[PATCH net-next] net, cgroup: cgroup_sk_updat_lock was missing initializer

2015-12-14 Thread Tejun Heo
bd1060a1d671 ("sock, cgroup: add sock->sk_cgroup") added global spinlock cgroup_sk_update_lock but erroneously skipped initializer leading to uninitialized spinlock warning. Fix it by using DEFINE_SPINLOCK(). Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo Reported-by: Dexuan Cui Fixes: bd1060a1d671 ("sock, cgroup: a