Dan Carpenter wrote:
> I told him to do that because it wasn't a bugfix... Probably just Fixes
> is the right thing to use though.
But the correct fix *is* a bug fix.
David
On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 11:13:16AM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> YueHaibing wrote:
>
> > net/rxrpc/output.c: In function 'rxrpc_reject_packets':
> > net/rxrpc/output.c:527:11: warning:
> > variable 'ioc' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
> >
> > It never used since introduction in
>
On 2018/10/9 18:13, David Howells wrote:
> YueHaibing wrote:
>
>> net/rxrpc/output.c: In function 'rxrpc_reject_packets':
>> net/rxrpc/output.c:527:11: warning:
>> variable 'ioc' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
>>
>> It never used since introduction in
>
> I wonder why my compiler
YueHaibing wrote:
> net/rxrpc/output.c: In function 'rxrpc_reject_packets':
> net/rxrpc/output.c:527:11: warning:
> variable 'ioc' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
>
> It never used since introduction in
I wonder why my compiler doesn't show this warning.
Anyway, NAK: just
Fixes gcc '-Wunused-but-set-variable' warning:
net/rxrpc/output.c: In function 'rxrpc_reject_packets':
net/rxrpc/output.c:527:11: warning:
variable 'ioc' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
It never used since introduction in
commit ece64fec164f ("rxrpc: Emit BUSY packets when supposed
