On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 07:08:15PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > From: Eric Dumazet
> >
> > Let's force a 16 bytes alignment on xt_counter percpu allocations,
> > so that bytes and packets sit in same cache line.
> >
> > xt_counter being exported to user space, we can
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 03:43:26AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet
> Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 18:10:13 -0700
>
> > From: Eric Dumazet
> >
> > Let's force a 16 bytes alignment on xt_counter percpu allocations,
> > so that bytes and packets sit in same cache line.
> >
> > xt_counte
From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 18:10:13 -0700
> From: Eric Dumazet
>
> Let's force a 16 bytes alignment on xt_counter percpu allocations,
> so that bytes and packets sit in same cache line.
>
> xt_counter being exported to user space, we cannot add __align(16) on
> the structure its
Eric Dumazet wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet
>
> Let's force a 16 bytes alignment on xt_counter percpu allocations,
> so that bytes and packets sit in same cache line.
>
> xt_counter being exported to user space, we cannot add __align(16) on
> the structure itself.
Sorry, I was away. Looks great.
From: Eric Dumazet
Let's force a 16 bytes alignment on xt_counter percpu allocations,
so that bytes and packets sit in same cache line.
xt_counter being exported to user space, we cannot add __align(16) on
the structure itself.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet
Cc: Florian Westphal
---
include/lin
