Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] skbuff: Fix applications not being woken for errors

Hi, Willem de Bruijn writes: >> Another interesting fact is that if the POLLIN event is added to the >> poll() .events, poll() no longer becomes stuck, > > The process has registered interest only in POLLIN, which the call to > sk_data_read (sock_def_readable)

Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] skbuff: Fix applications not being woken for errors

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 12:32 PM Willem de Bruijn < willemdebruijn.ker...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 4:35 PM, Vinicius Costa Gomes > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Changes from the RFC: > > - tweaked commit messages; > > > > Original cover letter: > > > > This

Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] skbuff: Fix applications not being woken for errors

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 4:35 PM, Vinicius Costa Gomes wrote: > Hi, > > Changes from the RFC: > - tweaked commit messages; > > Original cover letter: > > This is actually a "bug report"-RFC instead of the more usual "new > feature"-RFC. > > We are developing an

[PATCH net-next 0/2] skbuff: Fix applications not being woken for errors

Hi, Changes from the RFC: - tweaked commit messages; Original cover letter: This is actually a "bug report"-RFC instead of the more usual "new feature"-RFC. We are developing an application that uses TX hardware timestamping to make some measurements, and during development Randy Witt