Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] Automatic adjustment of max frame size

2015-10-26 Thread Keller, Jacob E
On Mon, 2015-10-26 at 09:56 +0900, Toshiaki Makita wrote: > On 2015/10/24 17:50, Toshiaki Makita wrote: > > David, > > > > I found my patch set is marked with Changes Requested, but I > > haven't > > seen any feedback. > > > > Could you give me your feedback? > > Somehow the mail from LD Linux

Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] Automatic adjustment of max frame size

2015-10-26 Thread David Miller
From: "Keller, Jacob E" Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 20:50:45 + > I am not sure why it failed to mail to it, unless netdev blocks non > subscribers from sending mail (it probably does) It absolutely does not. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 0/4] Automatic adjustment of max frame size

2015-10-25 Thread Toshiaki Makita
On 2015/10/23 13:46, ND Linux CI Server wrote: ... > checkpatch.pl has some complaints: > > > > checkpatch.pl results for patch "[PATCH 2/4] e1000e: Add ndo_enc_hdr_len" > > WARNING:LONG_LINE: line over 80

Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] Automatic adjustment of max frame size

2015-10-25 Thread Toshiaki Makita
On 2015/10/24 17:50, Toshiaki Makita wrote: > David, > > I found my patch set is marked with Changes Requested, but I haven't > seen any feedback. > > Could you give me your feedback? Somehow the mail from LD Linux CI Server did not reach netdev mailing list so I could not have seen it from

Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] Automatic adjustment of max frame size

2015-10-24 Thread Toshiaki Makita
David, I found my patch set is marked with Changes Requested, but I haven't seen any feedback. Could you give me your feedback? Thanks, Toshiaki Makita -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info

[PATCH net-next 0/4] Automatic adjustment of max frame size

2015-10-22 Thread Toshiaki Makita
This patch set tries to resolve packet drop by oversize error on receiving double tagged packets and possibly other encapsulated packets. Problem description: Currently most NICs have 4 bytes room of receive buffer for vlan header and can receive 1522 bytes frame at maximum. This is, however, not