Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] net: vlan: Use sizeof instead of literal number

[Gao Feng]

Hi David,

On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 9:36 AM, David Miller  wrote:
>
> It never makes sense to send the same patch for both net and net-next.
>
> If it's a bug fix, it goes to 'net'.  And it will be eventually
> be naturally merged into 'net-next'.
>
> Otherwise, if it's a new feature, cleanup, or optimization it goes to
> 'net-next'.

Because I forget add the "net-next" in the title of first patch, so I
send the second patch with right title.
And I have replied the first patch and said the reason.

Regards
Feng

Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] net: vlan: Use sizeof instead of literal number

[David Miller]

It never makes sense to send the same patch for both net and net-next.

If it's a bug fix, it goes to 'net'.  And it will be eventually
be naturally merged into 'net-next'.

Otherwise, if it's a new feature, cleanup, or optimization it goes to
'net-next'.

[PATCH net-next 1/1] net: vlan: Use sizeof instead of literal number

[fgao]

From: Gao Feng 

Use sizeof variable instead of literal number to enhance the readability.

Signed-off-by: Gao Feng 
---
 net/8021q/vlan.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/8021q/vlan.c b/net/8021q/vlan.c
index 8de138d..5a3903b 100644
--- a/net/8021q/vlan.c
+++ b/net/8021q/vlan.c
@@ -515,8 +515,8 @@ static int vlan_ioctl_handler(struct net *net, void __user 
*arg)
return -EFAULT;
 
/* Null terminate this sucker, just in case. */
-   args.device1[23] = 0;
-   args.u.device2[23] = 0;
+   args.device1[sizeof(args.device1) - 1] = 0;
+   args.u.device2[sizeof(args.u.device2) - 1] = 0;
 
rtnl_lock();
 
-- 
1.9.1