On Fri, 2015-06-12 at 18:50 -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
sure, that's better.
If you're going to submit it officialy, please add my Tested-by.
My server is happy now :)
Sure , will do.
I tried adding __must_check to __skb_header_pointer() but apparently had
to use W=1 to get a warning
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 06:37:34PM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Fri, 2015-06-12 at 18:27 -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 09:01:06AM -0700, Tom Herbert wrote:
If dst, hop-by-hop or routing extension headers are present determine
length of the options and skip over
On Fri, 2015-06-12 at 18:27 -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 09:01:06AM -0700, Tom Herbert wrote:
If dst, hop-by-hop or routing extension headers are present determine
length of the options and skip over them in flow dissection.
Signed-off-by: Tom Herbert
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 07:11:16PM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Fri, 2015-06-12 at 18:50 -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
sure, that's better.
If you're going to submit it officialy, please add my Tested-by.
My server is happy now :)
Sure , will do.
I tried adding __must_check
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 09:01:06AM -0700, Tom Herbert wrote:
If dst, hop-by-hop or routing extension headers are present determine
length of the options and skip over them in flow dissection.
Signed-off-by: Tom Herbert t...@herbertland.com
---
net/core/flow_dissector.c | 17
If dst, hop-by-hop or routing extension headers are present determine
length of the options and skip over them in flow dissection.
Signed-off-by: Tom Herbert t...@herbertland.com
---
net/core/flow_dissector.c | 17 +
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
diff --git