Re: [PATCH net-next 2/9] net: dsa: Add support for parsing the old binding

On 06/05/2016 08:19 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote: >> How much support do we want to have for the old binding for in tree >> platforms? Is the plan to migrate them all to the new binding? > > I think there are three cases to consider. > > 1) There are some old boards using setup.c files which have a

Re: [PATCH net-next 2/9] net: dsa: Add support for parsing the old binding

> How much support do we want to have for the old binding for in tree > platforms? Is the plan to migrate them all to the new binding? I think there are three cases to consider. 1) There are some old boards using setup.c files which have a platform device, platform data, etc. I've never used

Re: [PATCH net-next 2/9] net: dsa: Add support for parsing the old binding

Le 04/06/2016 13:00, Andrew Lunn a écrit : >> -static int dsa_cpu_parse(struct device_node *port, u32 index, >> - struct dsa_switch_tree *dst, >> - struct dsa_switch *ds) >> +static int _dsa_cpu_parse(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst, >> +

Re: [PATCH net-next 2/9] net: dsa: Add support for parsing the old binding

> -static int dsa_cpu_parse(struct device_node *port, u32 index, > - struct dsa_switch_tree *dst, > - struct dsa_switch *ds) > +static int _dsa_cpu_parse(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst, > +struct dsa_switch *ds, > +

Re: [PATCH net-next 2/9] net: dsa: Add support for parsing the old binding

> @@ -626,8 +736,8 @@ static int _dsa_register_switch(struct dsa_switch *ds, > struct device_node *np) > { > struct device_node *ports = dsa_get_ports(ds, np); > > - if (IS_ERR(ports)) > - return PTR_ERR(ports); > + if (IS_ERR(ports) && PTR_ERR(ports) == -EINVAL) > +

[PATCH net-next 2/9] net: dsa: Add support for parsing the old binding

Extend dsa2.c to support parsing for the old binding, which mostly means looking for more or less the same properties in different places. Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli --- net/dsa/dsa2.c | 142 ++--- 1 file changed,