From: Neal Cardwell <ncardw...@google.com>

There was a typo in this parameter name.

Signed-off-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardw...@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_bbr.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_bbr.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_bbr.c
index 
33f4358615e6d63b5c98a30484f12ffae66334a2..b88081285fd172444a844b6aec5d038c0f882594
 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_bbr.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_bbr.c
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ static const u32 bbr_probe_rtt_mode_ms = 200;
 static const int bbr_min_tso_rate = 1200000;
 
 /* Pace at ~1% below estimated bw, on average, to reduce queue at bottleneck. 
*/
-static const int bbr_pacing_marging_percent = 1;
+static const int bbr_pacing_margin_percent = 1;
 
 /* We use a high_gain value of 2/ln(2) because it's the smallest pacing gain
  * that will allow a smoothly increasing pacing rate that will double each RTT
@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ static u64 bbr_rate_bytes_per_sec(struct sock *sk, u64 
rate, int gain)
        rate *= mss;
        rate *= gain;
        rate >>= BBR_SCALE;
-       rate *= USEC_PER_SEC / 100 * (100 - bbr_pacing_marging_percent);
+       rate *= USEC_PER_SEC / 100 * (100 - bbr_pacing_margin_percent);
        return rate >> BW_SCALE;
 }
 
-- 
2.19.0.605.g01d371f741-goog

Reply via email to