From: David Ahern
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:18:20 -0600
> The intent here was to default to current behavior and to keep the
> details of that in one place. If you prefer table id to always enter
> with the right value I can make that happen.
I think it looks better that way.
People reading ind
On 8/11/15 12:14 PM, David Miller wrote:
From: David Ahern
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 11:50:33 -0600
@@ -427,6 +428,7 @@ int inet_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr,
int addr_len)
struct net *net = sock_net(sk);
unsigned short snum;
int chk_addr_ret;
+
From: David Ahern
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 11:50:33 -0600
> @@ -427,6 +428,7 @@ int inet_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr
> *uaddr, int addr_len)
> struct net *net = sock_net(sk);
> unsigned short snum;
> int chk_addr_ret;
> + int tb_id = 0;
> int err;
>
>
Currently inet_addr_type and inet_dev_addr_type expect local addresses
to be in the local table. With the VRF device local routes for devices
associated with a VRF will be in the table associated with the VRF.
Provide an alternate inet_addr lookup to use a specific table rather
than defaulting to t
