Hi David,
On 15-08-11 12:05:18, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Miller
> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:00:27 -0700 (PDT)
>
> > Ok, if you guys really want me to I'll do the revert-reapply thing.
>
> Done.
Thank you, this is much appreciated.
-v
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "u
From: David Miller
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:00:27 -0700 (PDT)
> Ok, if you guys really want me to I'll do the revert-reapply thing.
Done.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vge
From: David Miller
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 11:52:49 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Vivien Didelot
> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 14:18:42 -0400 (EDT)
>
>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 2:07 PM, David da...@davemloft.net wrote:
>>
>>> From: Florian Fainelli
>>> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 11:03:35 -0700
>>>
Put differen
From: Vivien Didelot
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 14:18:42 -0400 (EDT)
> On Aug 11, 2015, at 2:07 PM, David da...@davemloft.net wrote:
>
>> From: Florian Fainelli
>> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 11:03:35 -0700
>>
>>> Put differently, my question is how do you value not rewriting
>>> history vs. breaking b
Hi David,
On Aug 11, 2015, at 2:07 PM, David da...@davemloft.net wrote:
> From: Florian Fainelli
> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 11:03:35 -0700
>
>> Put differently, my question is how do you value not rewriting
>> history vs. breaking bisectability (by accident of course)?
>
> I never will rewrite h
From: Florian Fainelli
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 11:03:35 -0700
> Put differently, my question is how do you value not rewriting
> history vs. breaking bisectability (by accident of course)?
I never will rewrite history, ever.
Too many people clone my tree and depend upon it.
--
To unsubscribe fr
On 11/08/15 10:38, David Miller wrote:
> From: Vivien Didelot
> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:25:06 -0400 (EDT)
>
>> I can work on fixup patches to restore v3 changes on top of v2, but this
>> won't fix the bisectability issue.
>>
>> Instead of fixing individual portions, reverting the merge commit
>
From: Vivien Didelot
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:25:06 -0400 (EDT)
> I can work on fixup patches to restore v3 changes on top of v2, but this
> won't fix the bisectability issue.
>
> Instead of fixing individual portions, reverting the merge commit
> f1d5ca4: "Merge branch 'mv88e6xxx-switchdev-fdb
Hi David,
On Aug 10, 2015, at 9:39 AM, Vivien Didelot vivien.dide...@savoirfairelinux.com
wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On 15-08-09 22:48:22, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Vivien Didelot
>> Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 01:44:01 -0400
>>
>> > This patchset refactors the DSA and mv88e6xxx code to use the swi
Hi David,
On 15-08-09 22:48:22, David Miller wrote:
> From: Vivien Didelot
> Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 01:44:01 -0400
>
> > This patchset refactors the DSA and mv88e6xxx code to use the switchdev FDB
> > objects.
>
> Series applied, thanks.
I noticed you didn't push the serie yet. I've just sent
From: Vivien Didelot
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 01:44:01 -0400
> This patchset refactors the DSA and mv88e6xxx code to use the switchdev FDB
> objects.
Series applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
M
This patchset refactors the DSA and mv88e6xxx code to use the switchdev FDB
objects.
The first two patches add minor but necessary changes to switchdev, the third
one implements the switchdev glue in DSA for FDB routines, and the remaining
ones refactor the FDB access functions in the mv88e6xxx co
12 matches
Mail list logo
