On 12/3/18 6:46 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Yes, we have been discussing that topic with Andrew and have a few ideas
> on how that could be achieved, but not code to use that at the moment.
> One of the idea was to finally allow enslaving the DSA master network
> device, that way you could
> Yes the current solution whereby we need to get a hold on the network
> device's struct device reference is not quite ideal, AFAIR, Andrew has
> had the same problem.
Yes, it is not nice, and there is a race with systemd renaming the
interfaces using its naming rules. We need a way to lookup an
On 12/3/18 3:42 PM, Steve Douthit wrote:
>> Not directly related to this patch series, are you using the legacy or
>> "new" way of passing platform data in order to register the DSA switch?
>> Since you mentioned 6390, I would assume this must be the "new" way of
>> registering DSA devices with
> Not directly related to this patch series, are you using the legacy or
> "new" way of passing platform data in order to register the DSA switch?
> Since you mentioned 6390, I would assume this must be the "new" way of
> registering DSA devices with mdio_boardinfo etc. In that case, have you
>
On 12/3/18 12:14 PM, Steve Douthit wrote:
> Changes from v3 -> v4
> * Remove unecessary pointer casts
> * Fix copy/paste issues in comments
> * Simplify setting of swfw semaphore flags
> * Collect Reviewed-by: tags
>
> Changes from v2 -> v3
> * Added warnings about interactions between this code
Changes from v3 -> v4
* Remove unecessary pointer casts
* Fix copy/paste issues in comments
* Simplify setting of swfw semaphore flags
* Collect Reviewed-by: tags
Changes from v2 -> v3
* Added warnings about interactions between this code and PHY polling
unit to the commit messages.
Changes
