Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 10:29:52AM CEST, johan...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
>On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 10:13 +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 09:29:18AM CEST, johan...@sipsolutions.net
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 09:19 +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > +
On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 10:13 +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 09:29:18AM CEST, johan...@sipsolutions.net
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 09:19 +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> > >
> > > > + NUM_NLMSGERR_ATTRS,
> > >
> > > According to the rest of the uapi, this should be rather
Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 09:29:18AM CEST, johan...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
>On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 09:19 +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>
>> > + NUM_NLMSGERR_ATTRS,
>>
>> According to the rest of the uapi, this should be rather named:
>> __NLMSGERR_ATTR_MAX
>
>nl80211 uses NUM_ so I guess that's a
On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 09:19 +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>
> > + NUM_NLMSGERR_ATTRS,
>
> According to the rest of the uapi, this should be rather named:
> __NLMSGERR_ATTR_MAX
nl80211 uses NUM_ so I guess that's a matter of convention, but I can
change that I guess.
> > if (err
Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 08:56:56AM CEST, johan...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
>From: Johannes Berg
>
>Add the base infrastructure and UAPI for netlink
>extended ACK reporting. All "manual" calls to
>netlink_ack() pass NULL for now and thus don't
>get extended ACK reporting.
>
Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 08:56:56AM CEST, johan...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
>From: Johannes Berg
>
>Add the base infrastructure and UAPI for netlink
>extended ACK reporting. All "manual" calls to
>netlink_ack() pass NULL for now and thus don't
>get extended ACK reporting.
From: Johannes Berg
Add the base infrastructure and UAPI for netlink
extended ACK reporting. All "manual" calls to
netlink_ack() pass NULL for now and thus don't
get extended ACK reporting.
Big thanks goes to Pablo Neira Ayuso for not only
bringing up the whole topic at