Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] net: dsa: exit probe if no switch were found

2015-10-06 Thread Neil Armstrong
On 10/03/2015 09:27 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Le 03/10/2015 07:26, Neil Armstrong a écrit :
>> If no switch were found in dsa_setup_dst, return -ENODEV and
>> exit the dsa_probe cleanly.
>>
>> Tested-by: Andrew Lunn 
>> Tested-by: Florian Fainelli 
>> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong 
>> ---
> 
> [snip]
> 
>>  static int dsa_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> @@ -926,9 +937,9 @@ static int dsa_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>
>>  platform_set_drvdata(pdev, dst);
>>
>> -dsa_setup_dst(dst, dev, >dev, pd);
>> -
>> -return 0;
>> +ret = dsa_setup_dst(dst, dev, >dev, pd);
>> +if (!ret)
>> +return 0;
> 
> That logic is a little weird, I would just go with something like this:
> 
> ret = dsa_setup_dst(ds, dev, >dev, pd);
> if (ret)
>   goto out;
> 
> return 0;
> 
Yes you are right, the goto out is needed to clean up the of_probe resources.

I will send a v3 with this fixed.

Neil
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[PATCH v2 5/5] net: dsa: exit probe if no switch were found

2015-10-03 Thread Neil Armstrong
If no switch were found in dsa_setup_dst, return -ENODEV and
exit the dsa_probe cleanly.

Tested-by: Andrew Lunn 
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli 
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong 
---
 net/dsa/dsa.c | 19 +++
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/dsa/dsa.c b/net/dsa/dsa.c
index dd171ff..9c521b7 100644
--- a/net/dsa/dsa.c
+++ b/net/dsa/dsa.c
@@ -836,10 +836,11 @@ static inline void dsa_of_remove(struct device *dev)
 }
 #endif

-static void dsa_setup_dst(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst, struct net_device *dev,
+static int dsa_setup_dst(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst, struct net_device *dev,
  struct device *parent, struct dsa_platform_data *pd)
 {
int i;
+   unsigned configured = 0;

dst->pd = pd;
dst->master_netdev = dev;
@@ -859,9 +860,17 @@ static void dsa_setup_dst(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst, 
struct net_device *dev,
dst->ds[i] = ds;
if (ds->drv->poll_link != NULL)
dst->link_poll_needed = 1;
+
+   ++configured;
}

/*
+* If no switch was found, exit cleanly
+*/
+   if (!configured)
+   return -EPROBE_DEFER;
+
+   /*
 * If we use a tagging format that doesn't have an ethertype
 * field, make sure that all packets from this point on get
 * sent to the tag format's receive function.
@@ -877,6 +886,8 @@ static void dsa_setup_dst(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst, 
struct net_device *dev,
dst->link_poll_timer.expires = round_jiffies(jiffies + HZ);
add_timer(>link_poll_timer);
}
+
+   return 0;
 }

 static int dsa_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
@@ -926,9 +937,9 @@ static int dsa_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)

platform_set_drvdata(pdev, dst);

-   dsa_setup_dst(dst, dev, >dev, pd);
-
-   return 0;
+   ret = dsa_setup_dst(dst, dev, >dev, pd);
+   if (!ret)
+   return 0;

 out:
dsa_of_remove(>dev);
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] net: dsa: exit probe if no switch were found

2015-10-03 Thread Florian Fainelli
Le 03/10/2015 07:26, Neil Armstrong a écrit :
> If no switch were found in dsa_setup_dst, return -ENODEV and
> exit the dsa_probe cleanly.
> 
> Tested-by: Andrew Lunn 
> Tested-by: Florian Fainelli 
> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong 
> ---

[snip]

>  static int dsa_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> @@ -926,9 +937,9 @@ static int dsa_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> 
>   platform_set_drvdata(pdev, dst);
> 
> - dsa_setup_dst(dst, dev, >dev, pd);
> -
> - return 0;
> + ret = dsa_setup_dst(dst, dev, >dev, pd);
> + if (!ret)
> + return 0;

That logic is a little weird, I would just go with something like this:

ret = dsa_setup_dst(ds, dev, >dev, pd);
if (ret)
goto out;

return 0;
-- 
Florian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html