On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 14:10 +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2017-11-12 00:54, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > From: Eric Dumazet
> >
> > I had many reports that TSQ logic breaks wifi aggregation.
> >
> > Current logic is to allow up to 1 ms of bytes to be queued into
> > qdisc
> > and drivers queues.
>
On 2017-11-12 00:54, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet
>
> I had many reports that TSQ logic breaks wifi aggregation.
>
> Current logic is to allow up to 1 ms of bytes to be queued into qdisc
> and drivers queues.
>
> But Wifi aggregation needs a bigger budget to allow bigger rates to
>
From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2017 15:54:12 -0800
> From: Eric Dumazet
>
> I had many reports that TSQ logic breaks wifi aggregation.
>
> Current logic is to allow up to 1 ms of bytes to be queued into qdisc
> and drivers queues.
>
> But Wifi aggregation needs a bigger budget to allow
On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 6:54 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> From: Eric Dumazet
>
> I had many reports that TSQ logic breaks wifi aggregation.
>
> Current logic is to allow up to 1 ms of bytes to be queued into qdisc
> and drivers queues.
>
> But Wifi aggregation needs a bigger budget to allow bigger
From: Eric Dumazet
I had many reports that TSQ logic breaks wifi aggregation.
Current logic is to allow up to 1 ms of bytes to be queued into qdisc
and drivers queues.
But Wifi aggregation needs a bigger budget to allow bigger rates to
be discovered by various TCP Congestion Controls algorithms