From: Yoshihiro Shimoda
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 14:40:51 +0900
> This patch fixes an issue that a syscall (e.g. sendto syscall) cannot
> work correctly. Since the sendto syscall doesn't have msg_control buffer,
> the sock_tx_timestamp() in packet_snd() cannot
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 8:34 AM, Soheil Hassas Yeganeh
wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 1:40 AM, Yoshihiro Shimoda
> wrote:
>> This patch fixes an issue that a syscall (e.g. sendto syscall) cannot
>> work correctly. Since the sendto syscall
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 1:40 AM, Yoshihiro Shimoda
wrote:
> This patch fixes an issue that a syscall (e.g. sendto syscall) cannot
> work correctly. Since the sendto syscall doesn't have msg_control buffer,
> the sock_tx_timestamp() in packet_snd() cannot work
This patch fixes an issue that a syscall (e.g. sendto syscall) cannot
work correctly. Since the sendto syscall doesn't have msg_control buffer,
the sock_tx_timestamp() in packet_snd() cannot work correctly because
the socks.tsflags is set to 0.
So, this patch sets the socks.tsflags to