From: Tejun Heo
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 13:52:44 -0500
> This is the second take of the xt_cgroup2 patchset. Changes from the
> last take are
>
> * Instead of adding sock->sk_cgroup separately, sock->sk_cgrp_data now
> carries either (prioidx, classid) pair or cgroup2
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 08:56:25PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> Regarding #7, I have a couple two concerns:
>
> 1) cgroup currently doesn't work the way users expect, ie. to perform any
>reasonable firewalling. Since this relies on early demux, only a
>limited number of sockets get
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 01:59:12PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Tejun Heo
> Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 13:52:44 -0500
>
> > This is the second take of the xt_cgroup2 patchset. Changes from the
> > last take are
> >
> > * Instead of adding sock->sk_cgroup separately,
Hello, David, Pablo.
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 08:56:25PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > Pablo, are you ok with me merging this into net-next directly or
> > would you rather I take patches 1-6 into net-next and then you can
> > merge and then add patch #7 on top?
>
> I'd suggest you get 1-6,
Hello,
This is the second take of the xt_cgroup2 patchset. Changes from the
last take are
* Instead of adding sock->sk_cgroup separately, sock->sk_cgrp_data now
carries either (prioidx, classid) pair or cgroup2 pointer. This
avoids inflating struct sock with yet another cgroup related