Re: [PATCHv2 net] sctp: fix the issue that pathmtu may be set lower than MINSEGMENT
From: Xin Long
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2018 16:30:47 +0800
> After commit b6c5734db070 ("sctp: fix the handling of ICMP Frag Needed
> for too small MTUs"), sctp_transport_update_pmtu would refetch pathmtu
> from the dst and set it to transport's pathmtu without any check.
>
> The new pathmtu may be lower than MINSEGMENT if the dst is obsolete and
> updated by .get_dst() in sctp_transport_update_pmtu. In this case, it
> could have a smaller MTU as well, and thus we should validate it
> against MINSEGMENT instead.
>
> Syzbot reported a warning in sctp_mtu_payload caused by this.
>
> This patch refetches the pathmtu by calling sctp_dst_mtu where it does
> the check against MINSEGMENT.
>
> v1->v2:
> - refetch the pathmtu by calling sctp_dst_mtu instead as Marcelo's
> suggestion.
>
> Fixes: b6c5734db070 ("sctp: fix the handling of ICMP Frag Needed for too
> small MTUs")
> Reported-by: syzbot+f0d9d7cba052f9344...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Suggested-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
> Signed-off-by: Xin Long
Applied and queued up for -stable.
Re: [PATCHv2 net] sctp: fix the issue that pathmtu may be set lower than MINSEGMENT
On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 04:30:47PM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
> After commit b6c5734db070 ("sctp: fix the handling of ICMP Frag Needed
> for too small MTUs"), sctp_transport_update_pmtu would refetch pathmtu
> from the dst and set it to transport's pathmtu without any check.
>
> The new pathmtu may be lower than MINSEGMENT if the dst is obsolete and
> updated by .get_dst() in sctp_transport_update_pmtu. In this case, it
> could have a smaller MTU as well, and thus we should validate it
> against MINSEGMENT instead.
>
> Syzbot reported a warning in sctp_mtu_payload caused by this.
>
> This patch refetches the pathmtu by calling sctp_dst_mtu where it does
> the check against MINSEGMENT.
>
> v1->v2:
> - refetch the pathmtu by calling sctp_dst_mtu instead as Marcelo's
> suggestion.
>
> Fixes: b6c5734db070 ("sctp: fix the handling of ICMP Frag Needed for too
> small MTUs")
> Reported-by: syzbot+f0d9d7cba052f9344...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Suggested-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
> Signed-off-by: Xin Long
> ---
> net/sctp/transport.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sctp/transport.c b/net/sctp/transport.c
> index 445b7ef..12cac85 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/transport.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/transport.c
> @@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ bool sctp_transport_update_pmtu(struct sctp_transport *t,
> u32 pmtu)
>
> if (dst) {
> /* Re-fetch, as under layers may have a higher minimum size */
> - pmtu = SCTP_TRUNC4(dst_mtu(dst));
> + pmtu = sctp_dst_mtu(dst);
> change = t->pathmtu != pmtu;
> }
> t->pathmtu = pmtu;
> --
> 2.1.0
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
Acked-by: Neil Horman
Re: [PATCHv2 net] sctp: fix the issue that pathmtu may be set lower than MINSEGMENT
On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 04:30:47PM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
> After commit b6c5734db070 ("sctp: fix the handling of ICMP Frag Needed
> for too small MTUs"), sctp_transport_update_pmtu would refetch pathmtu
> from the dst and set it to transport's pathmtu without any check.
>
> The new pathmtu may be lower than MINSEGMENT if the dst is obsolete and
> updated by .get_dst() in sctp_transport_update_pmtu. In this case, it
> could have a smaller MTU as well, and thus we should validate it
> against MINSEGMENT instead.
>
> Syzbot reported a warning in sctp_mtu_payload caused by this.
>
> This patch refetches the pathmtu by calling sctp_dst_mtu where it does
> the check against MINSEGMENT.
>
> v1->v2:
> - refetch the pathmtu by calling sctp_dst_mtu instead as Marcelo's
> suggestion.
>
> Fixes: b6c5734db070 ("sctp: fix the handling of ICMP Frag Needed for too
> small MTUs")
> Reported-by: syzbot+f0d9d7cba052f9344...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Suggested-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
> Signed-off-by: Xin Long
Acked-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
> ---
> net/sctp/transport.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sctp/transport.c b/net/sctp/transport.c
> index 445b7ef..12cac85 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/transport.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/transport.c
> @@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ bool sctp_transport_update_pmtu(struct sctp_transport *t,
> u32 pmtu)
>
> if (dst) {
> /* Re-fetch, as under layers may have a higher minimum size */
> - pmtu = SCTP_TRUNC4(dst_mtu(dst));
> + pmtu = sctp_dst_mtu(dst);
> change = t->pathmtu != pmtu;
> }
> t->pathmtu = pmtu;
> --
> 2.1.0
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
[PATCHv2 net] sctp: fix the issue that pathmtu may be set lower than MINSEGMENT
After commit b6c5734db070 ("sctp: fix the handling of ICMP Frag Needed
for too small MTUs"), sctp_transport_update_pmtu would refetch pathmtu
from the dst and set it to transport's pathmtu without any check.
The new pathmtu may be lower than MINSEGMENT if the dst is obsolete and
updated by .get_dst() in sctp_transport_update_pmtu. In this case, it
could have a smaller MTU as well, and thus we should validate it
against MINSEGMENT instead.
Syzbot reported a warning in sctp_mtu_payload caused by this.
This patch refetches the pathmtu by calling sctp_dst_mtu where it does
the check against MINSEGMENT.
v1->v2:
- refetch the pathmtu by calling sctp_dst_mtu instead as Marcelo's
suggestion.
Fixes: b6c5734db070 ("sctp: fix the handling of ICMP Frag Needed for too small
MTUs")
Reported-by: syzbot+f0d9d7cba052f9344...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Suggested-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
Signed-off-by: Xin Long
---
net/sctp/transport.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/sctp/transport.c b/net/sctp/transport.c
index 445b7ef..12cac85 100644
--- a/net/sctp/transport.c
+++ b/net/sctp/transport.c
@@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ bool sctp_transport_update_pmtu(struct sctp_transport *t,
u32 pmtu)
if (dst) {
/* Re-fetch, as under layers may have a higher minimum size */
- pmtu = SCTP_TRUNC4(dst_mtu(dst));
+ pmtu = sctp_dst_mtu(dst);
change = t->pathmtu != pmtu;
}
t->pathmtu = pmtu;
--
2.1.0
