From: marcelo.leit...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 18:13:02 -0200
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 03:53:48PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Xin Long
>> Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 00:42:35 +0800
>>
>> > Prior to this patch, it used a local variable to save the transport that
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 03:53:48PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Xin Long
> Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 00:42:35 +0800
>
> > Prior to this patch, it used a local variable to save the transport that is
> > looked up by __sctp_lookup_association(), and didn't return it back.
From: Xin Long
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 00:42:35 +0800
> Prior to this patch, it used a local variable to save the transport that is
> looked up by __sctp_lookup_association(), and didn't return it back. But in
> sctp_rcv, it is used to initialize chunk->transport. So when
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 6:51 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 12:42:35AM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
>> Prior to this patch, it used a local variable to save the transport that is
>> looked up by __sctp_lookup_association(), and didn't return it
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 12:42:35AM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
> Prior to this patch, it used a local variable to save the transport that is
> looked up by __sctp_lookup_association(), and didn't return it back. But in
> sctp_rcv, it is used to initialize chunk->transport. So when hitting this,
> even
Prior to this patch, it used a local variable to save the transport that is
looked up by __sctp_lookup_association(), and didn't return it back. But in
sctp_rcv, it is used to initialize chunk->transport. So when hitting this,
even if it found the transport, it was still initializing