Le 08/09/15 10:35, Andrew Lunn a écrit :
>>> The optional mii-bus properties i'm adding should be used in
>>> preference to this global one, for this switch. Keeping the names the
>>> same makes sense. But i did drop the dsa prefix to indicate it is
>>> local, not global scope,
>>
>>Dropping a
> >The optional mii-bus properties i'm adding should be used in
> >preference to this global one, for this switch. Keeping the names the
> >same makes sense. But i did drop the dsa prefix to indicate it is
> >local, not global scope,
>
>Dropping a vendor prefix usually means that it's (standar
On 8/9/2015 5:20 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
When using a cluster of switches, some topologies will have an MDIO
bus per switch, not one for the whole cluster. Allow this to be
represented in the device tree, by adding an optional mii-bus property
at the switch level.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn
R
On Sun, Aug 09, 2015 at 03:39:25PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 8/9/2015 4:29 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>
> >When using a cluster of switches, some topologies will have an MDIO
> >bus per switch, not one for the whole cluster. Allow this to be
> >represented in the device tree, by a
Hello.
On 8/9/2015 4:29 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
When using a cluster of switches, some topologies will have an MDIO
bus per switch, not one for the whole cluster. Allow this to be
represented in the device tree, by adding an optional mii-bus property
at the switch level.
Signed-off-by: Andrew
When using a cluster of switches, some topologies will have an MDIO
bus per switch, not one for the whole cluster. Allow this to be
represented in the device tree, by adding an optional mii-bus property
at the switch level.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli
---
v2: Fix do
