Re: [RFC/PATCH] Add a socketoption IPV6_MULTICAST_ALL analogue to the IPV4 version

2018-08-28 Thread Andre Naujoks
On 5/8/18 1:48 PM, 吉藤英明 wrote: > Hi, > > 2018-05-08 15:41 GMT+09:00 Andre Naujoks : >> On 08.05.2018 08:31, 吉藤英明 wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> 2018-05-08 15:03 GMT+09:00 Andre Naujoks : On 11.04.2018 13:02, Andre Naujoks wrote: > Hi. Hi again. Since it has been a month now,

Re: [RFC/PATCH] Add a socketoption IPV6_MULTICAST_ALL analogue to the IPV4 version

2018-05-08 Thread 吉藤英明
Hi, 2018-05-08 15:41 GMT+09:00 Andre Naujoks : > On 08.05.2018 08:31, 吉藤英明 wrote: >> Hi, >> >> 2018-05-08 15:03 GMT+09:00 Andre Naujoks : >>> On 11.04.2018 13:02, Andre Naujoks wrote: Hi. >>> >>> Hi again. >>> >>> Since it has been a month now, I'd

Re: [RFC/PATCH] Add a socketoption IPV6_MULTICAST_ALL analogue to the IPV4 version

2018-05-08 Thread Andre Naujoks
On 08.05.2018 08:31, 吉藤英明 wrote: > Hi, > > 2018-05-08 15:03 GMT+09:00 Andre Naujoks : >> On 11.04.2018 13:02, Andre Naujoks wrote: >>> Hi. >> >> Hi again. >> >> Since it has been a month now, I'd like to send a little "ping" on this >> subject. >> >> Is anything wrong with

Re: [RFC/PATCH] Add a socketoption IPV6_MULTICAST_ALL analogue to the IPV4 version

2018-05-08 Thread 吉藤英明
Hi, 2018-05-08 15:03 GMT+09:00 Andre Naujoks : > On 11.04.2018 13:02, Andre Naujoks wrote: >> Hi. > > Hi again. > > Since it has been a month now, I'd like to send a little "ping" on this > subject. > > Is anything wrong with this? Or was it just bad timing? I'm just

Re: [RFC/PATCH] Add a socketoption IPV6_MULTICAST_ALL analogue to the IPV4 version

2018-05-08 Thread Andre Naujoks
On 11.04.2018 13:02, Andre Naujoks wrote: > Hi. Hi again. Since it has been a month now, I'd like to send a little "ping" on this subject. Is anything wrong with this? Or was it just bad timing? Regards Andre > > I was running into a problem, when trying to join multiple multicast groups >

[RFC/PATCH] Add a socketoption IPV6_MULTICAST_ALL analogue to the IPV4 version

2018-04-11 Thread Andre Naujoks
Hi. I was running into a problem, when trying to join multiple multicast groups on a single socket and thus binding to the any-address on said socket. I received traffic from multicast groups, I did not join on that socket and was at first surprised by that. After reading some old