Re: [RFC feedback] AF_XDP and non-Intel hardware

Den mån 4 juni 2018 kl 11:44 skrev Mykyta Iziumtsev : > > Hi Björn and Magnus, > > Here is a short update on the proposed changes to AF_XDP. > > During implementation phase I figured out that 'end-of-page' in RX > descriptor's flags won't work, unfortunately. This is because the > kernel driver

Re: [RFC feedback] AF_XDP and non-Intel hardware

Hi Björn and Magnus, Here is a short update on the proposed changes to AF_XDP. During implementation phase I figured out that 'end-of-page' in RX descriptor's flags won't work, unfortunately. This is because the kernel driver can't know if the frame will be last on the page when RX descriptor is

Re: [RFC feedback] AF_XDP and non-Intel hardware

2018-05-22 9:45 GMT+02:00 Mykyta Iziumtsev : > On 21 May 2018 at 20:55, Björn Töpel wrote: >> 2018-05-21 14:34 GMT+02:00 Mykyta Iziumtsev : >>> Hi Björn and Magnus, >>> >>> (This thread is a follow up to private

Re: [RFC feedback] AF_XDP and non-Intel hardware

On 21 May 2018 at 20:55, Björn Töpel wrote: > > 2018-05-21 14:34 GMT+02:00 Mykyta Iziumtsev : > > Hi Björn and Magnus, > > > > (This thread is a follow up to private dialogue. The intention is to > > let community know that AF_XDP can be

Re: [RFC feedback] AF_XDP and non-Intel hardware

On 21 May 2018 at 20:55, Björn Töpel wrote: > 2018-05-21 14:34 GMT+02:00 Mykyta Iziumtsev : >> Hi Björn and Magnus, >> >> (This thread is a follow up to private dialogue. The intention is to >> let community know that AF_XDP can be enhanced

Re: [RFC feedback] AF_XDP and non-Intel hardware

2018-05-21 14:34 GMT+02:00 Mykyta Iziumtsev : > Hi Björn and Magnus, > > (This thread is a follow up to private dialogue. The intention is to > let community know that AF_XDP can be enhanced further to make it > compatible with wider range of NIC vendors). > Mykyta,

[RFC feedback] AF_XDP and non-Intel hardware

Hi Björn and Magnus, (This thread is a follow up to private dialogue. The intention is to let community know that AF_XDP can be enhanced further to make it compatible with wider range of NIC vendors). There are two NIC variations which don't fit well with current AF_XDP proposal. The first