On 19.06.2018 16:24, Ganesh Goudar wrote:
On Monday, June 06/11/18, 2018 at 14:47:55 +0530, Ganesh Goudar wrote:
On Saturday, June 06/09/18, 2018 at 18:47:55 -0600, David Ahern wrote:
Ganesh:
On 6/4/18 9:03 AM, AMG Zollner Robert wrote:
I have noticed that vrf is not working with kernel
On Saturday, June 06/09/18, 2018 at 18:47:55 -0600, David Ahern wrote:
> Ganesh:
>
> On 6/4/18 9:03 AM, AMG Zollner Robert wrote:
> > I have noticed that vrf is not working with kernel v4.15.0 but was
> > working with v4.13.0 when using cxgb4 Chelsio driver (T520-cr)
> >
> > Setup:
> > Two metal
Ganesh:
On 6/4/18 9:03 AM, AMG Zollner Robert wrote:
> I have noticed that vrf is not working with kernel v4.15.0 but was
> working with v4.13.0 when using cxgb4 Chelsio driver (T520-cr)
>
> Setup:
> Two metal servers with a T520-cr card each, directly connected without a
> switch in between.
>
On 6/4/18 1:14 PM, AMG Zollner Robert wrote:
> Yes, I was enslaving while the interface was up.
>
> Just tested some of the builds that where not working earlier and they
> are working if I keep the interface down when enslaving as you suggested.
>
> Is this the expected behavior?
Not expected
Yes, I was enslaving while the interface was up.
Just tested some of the builds that where not working earlier and they
are working if I keep the interface down when enslaving as you suggested.
Is this the expected behavior?
Thank you,
Zollner Robert
On 04.06.2018 21:17, David Ahern wrote:
On 6/4/18 8:03 AM, AMG Zollner Robert wrote:
> I have noticed that vrf is not working with kernel v4.15.0 but was
> working with v4.13.0 when using cxgb4 Chelsio driver (T520-cr)
>
> Setup:
> Two metal servers with a T520-cr card each, directly connected without a
> switch in between.
>
>
I have noticed that vrf is not working with kernel v4.15.0 but was
working with v4.13.0 when using cxgb4 Chelsio driver (T520-cr)
Setup:
Two metal servers with a T520-cr card each, directly connected without a
switch in between.
SVR1 only ipfwd SVR2 with vrf
