Rusty Russell wrote:
On Wednesday 12 December 2007 23:54:00 Dor Laor wrote:
commit 763769621d271d92204ed27552d75448587c1ac0
Author: Dor Laor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed Dec 12 14:52:00 2007 +0200
[virtio-net][PATCH] Don't arm tx hrtimer with a constant 50us each
transmit
The
On Tuesday 18 December 2007 16:30:08 Avi Kivity wrote:
Rusty Russell wrote:
Yes, I pondered this when I wrote the code. On the one hand, it's a
low-probability pathological corner case, on the other, your patch
reduces the number of timer reprograms in the normal case.
One thing that
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 12. Dezember 2007 schrieb Dor Laor:
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 12. Dezember 2007 schrieb Dor Laor:
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -406,10 +405,10 @@ again:
Hmm, while I agree in general
Am Mittwoch, 12. Dezember 2007 schrieb Dor Laor:
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -406,10 +405,10 @@ again:
Hmm, while I agree in general with the patch, I fail to find the proper
version of virtio_net where this patch applies. I tried kvm.git and
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 12. Dezember 2007 schrieb Dor Laor:
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -406,10 +405,10 @@ again:
Hmm, while I agree in general with the patch, I fail to find the proper
version of virtio_net where this patch applies. I
Am Mittwoch, 12. Dezember 2007 schrieb Dor Laor:
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 12. Dezember 2007 schrieb Dor Laor:
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -406,10 +405,10 @@ again:
Hmm, while I agree in general with the patch, I fail to find
