Re: [LKP] [net] 2ab9fb18c4: kernel BUG at include/linux/skbuff.h:1935!

2016-11-15 Thread Alexander Duyck
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 7:11 PM, Fengguang Wu wrote: >>> Hi guys. >>> >>> I took a look at the commit again and I do not see how this can happen. >>> >>> Are you sure patch was properly applied ? >>> >>> In particular, the following extract is obscure for me : >>> >>>

Re: [net] 2ab9fb18c4: kernel BUG at include/linux/skbuff.h:1935!

2016-11-14 Thread Duyck, Alexander H
On Mon, 2016-11-14 at 07:49 +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > FYI, we noticed the following commit: > > https://github.com/0day-ci/linux > Eric-Dumazet/net-__skb_flow_dissect-must-cap-its-return-value/20161110-080839 > commit 2ab9fb18c46b91b16a0f0f329336d3be9fc32deb ("net: __skb_flow_dissect()

Re: [LKP] [net] 2ab9fb18c4: kernel BUG at include/linux/skbuff.h:1935!

2016-11-13 Thread Ye Xiaolong
On 11/14, Fengguang Wu wrote: >>>Hi guys. >>> >>>I took a look at the commit again and I do not see how this can happen. >>> >>>Are you sure patch was properly applied ? >>> >>>In particular, the following extract is obscure for me : >>> >>> https://github.com/0day-ci/linux

Re: [LKP] [net] 2ab9fb18c4: kernel BUG at include/linux/skbuff.h:1935!

2016-11-13 Thread Fengguang Wu
Hi guys. I took a look at the commit again and I do not see how this can happen. Are you sure patch was properly applied ? In particular, the following extract is obscure for me : https://github.com/0day-ci/linux Eric-Dumazet/net-__skb_flow_dissect-must-cap-its-return-value/20161110-080839

Re: [net] 2ab9fb18c4: kernel BUG at include/linux/skbuff.h:1935!

2016-11-13 Thread Ye Xiaolong
On 11/13, Eric Dumazet wrote: >On Mon, 2016-11-14 at 07:49 +0800, kernel test robot wrote: >> FYI, we noticed the following commit: > > >> in testcase: kbuild >> with following parameters: >> >> runtime: 300s >> nr_task: 50% >> cpufreq_governor: performance >> >> >> >> >> on

Re: [net] 2ab9fb18c4: kernel BUG at include/linux/skbuff.h:1935!

2016-11-13 Thread Eric Dumazet
On Mon, 2016-11-14 at 07:49 +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > FYI, we noticed the following commit: > in testcase: kbuild > with following parameters: > > runtime: 300s > nr_task: 50% > cpufreq_governor: performance > > > > > on test machine: 8 threads Intel(R) Atom(TM)