Horms wrote:
Here is the revised patch.
[IPVS] Make sure ip_vs_ftp ports are valid
I'm not entirely sure what happens in the case of a valid port,
at best it'll be silently ignored. This patch ensures that
the port values are unsigned short values, and thus always valid.
Cc: Patrick
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 12:29:45PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
Horms wrote:
Here is the revised patch.
[IPVS] Make sure ip_vs_ftp ports are valid
I'm not entirely sure what happens in the case of a valid port,
at best it'll be silently ignored. This patch ensures that
the port
Horms wrote:
I'm not entirely sure what happens in the case of a valid port,
at best it'll be silently ignored. This patch ignores them a little
more verbosely.
Signed-Off-By: Simon Horman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: linux-2.6/net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_ftp.c
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 01:09:59AM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
Horms wrote:
I'm not entirely sure what happens in the case of a valid port,
at best it'll be silently ignored. This patch ignores them a little
more verbosely.
Signed-Off-By: Simon Horman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index:
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 09:44:02AM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 01:09:59AM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
Horms wrote:
I'm not entirely sure what happens in the case of a valid port,
at best it'll be silently ignored. This patch ignores them a little
more verbosely.
I'm not entirely sure what happens in the case of a valid port,
at best it'll be silently ignored. This patch ignores them a little
more verbosely.
Signed-Off-By: Simon Horman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: linux-2.6/net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_ftp.c
