Re: [patch net-next 00/15] mlxsw: Reflect nexthop status changes

From: Jiri Pirko Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 21:58:35 +0100 > Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 09:43:45PM CET, da...@davemloft.net wrote: >>From: David Miller >>Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 15:28:48 -0500 (EST) >> >>> Looks really nice, series applied, thanks! >> >>Jiri, just

Re: [patch net-next 00/15] mlxsw: Reflect nexthop status changes

From: Jiri Pirko Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 11:16:27 +0100 > From: Jiri Pirko > > Ido says: > > When the kernel forwards IPv4 packets via multipath routes it doesn't > consider nexthops that are dead or linkdown. For example, if the nexthop > netdev is

Re: [patch net-next 00/15] mlxsw: Reflect nexthop status changes

On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 03:43:45PM -0500, David Miller wrote: > From: David Miller > Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 15:28:48 -0500 (EST) > > > Looks really nice, series applied, thanks! > > Jiri, just FYI, I bungled up merging this. And I am trying to fix > that up. > > I forgot

Re: [patch net-next 00/15] mlxsw: Reflect nexthop status changes

Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 09:43:45PM CET, da...@davemloft.net wrote: >From: David Miller >Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 15:28:48 -0500 (EST) > >> Looks really nice, series applied, thanks! > >Jiri, just FYI, I bungled up merging this. And I am trying to fix >that up. > >I forgot to

Re: [patch net-next 00/15] mlxsw: Reflect nexthop status changes

From: David Miller Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 15:28:48 -0500 (EST) > Looks really nice, series applied, thanks! Jiri, just FYI, I bungled up merging this. And I am trying to fix that up. I forgot to include patch #14, but I'll apply that now in the mainline. I get a warning,

[patch net-next 00/15] mlxsw: Reflect nexthop status changes

From: Jiri Pirko Ido says: When the kernel forwards IPv4 packets via multipath routes it doesn't consider nexthops that are dead or linkdown. For example, if the nexthop netdev is administratively down or doesn't have a carrier. Devices capable of offloading such multipath