On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 3:13 AM Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Okay. So that would allow either create a chain or "chain with
> template". Once that is done, there would be no means to manipulate the
> template. One can only remove the chain.
>
> What about refounting? I think it would make sense that this
Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 12:18:02AM CEST, xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com wrote:
>On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 10:06 AM Samudrala, Sridhar
> wrote:
>>
>> So instead of introducing 'chaintemplate' object in the kernel, can't we add
>> 'chain'
>> object in the kernel that takes the 'template' as an attribute?
>
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 10:06 AM Samudrala, Sridhar
wrote:
>
> So instead of introducing 'chaintemplate' object in the kernel, can't we add
> 'chain'
> object in the kernel that takes the 'template' as an attribute?
This is exactly what I mean above. Making the chain a standalone object
in
On 6/29/2018 6:05 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 02:54:36PM CEST, dsah...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/29/18 6:48 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 02:12:21PM CEST, j...@mojatatu.com wrote:
On 29/06/18 04:39 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 12:25:53AM CEST,
From: David Ahern
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 06:54:36 -0600
> The resolution of the syntax affect the uapi changes proposed. You are
> wanting to add new RTM commands which suggests new objects. If a
> template is an attribute of an existing object then the netlink API
> should indicate that.
+1
Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 02:54:36PM CEST, dsah...@gmail.com wrote:
>On 6/29/18 6:48 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 02:12:21PM CEST, j...@mojatatu.com wrote:
>>> On 29/06/18 04:39 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 12:25:53AM CEST, xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com wrote:
> On
On 6/29/18 6:48 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 02:12:21PM CEST, j...@mojatatu.com wrote:
>> On 29/06/18 04:39 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>> Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 12:25:53AM CEST, xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 6:10 AM Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Add a template
Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 02:12:21PM CEST, j...@mojatatu.com wrote:
>On 29/06/18 04:39 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 12:25:53AM CEST, xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 6:10 AM Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> > > Add a template of type flower allowing to insert rules
On 29/06/18 04:39 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 12:25:53AM CEST, xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 6:10 AM Jiri Pirko wrote:
Add a template of type flower allowing to insert rules matching on last
2 bytes of destination mac address:
# tc chaintemplate add
Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 12:25:53AM CEST, xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com wrote:
>On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 6:10 AM Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Add a template of type flower allowing to insert rules matching on last
>> 2 bytes of destination mac address:
>> # tc chaintemplate add dev dummy0 ingress proto ip flower
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 6:10 AM Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Add a template of type flower allowing to insert rules matching on last
> 2 bytes of destination mac address:
> # tc chaintemplate add dev dummy0 ingress proto ip flower dst_mac
> 00:00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:FF:FF
>
> The template is now
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 9:48 PM David Miller wrote:
>
> This series doesn't apply cleanly to net-next, and also there seems to still
> be some discussion about how the iproute2 command line should look.
>
I am sure you know this, so just to be clear:
A redesign of "how iproute2 command line
Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 05:50:08PM CEST, dsah...@gmail.com wrote:
>On 6/28/18 9:37 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>
> Why this restriction? It's a template, so why can't it be removed
> regardless of whether there are filters?
That means you could start to insert filters that does not
On 6/28/18 9:37 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
Why this restriction? It's a template, so why can't it be removed
regardless of whether there are filters?
>>>
>>> That means you could start to insert filters that does not match the
>>> original template. I wanted to avoid it. The chain is
Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 05:10:45PM CEST, dsah...@gmail.com wrote:
>On 6/28/18 8:29 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 04:18:47PM CEST, dsah...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> On 6/28/18 7:08 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
Create dummy device with clsact first:
# ip link add type dummy
# tc
On 6/28/18 8:29 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 04:18:47PM CEST, dsah...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On 6/28/18 7:08 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>> Create dummy device with clsact first:
>>> # ip link add type dummy
>>> # tc qdisc add dev dummy0 clsact
>>>
>>> There is no template assigned by
Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 04:18:47PM CEST, dsah...@gmail.com wrote:
>On 6/28/18 7:08 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Create dummy device with clsact first:
>> # ip link add type dummy
>> # tc qdisc add dev dummy0 clsact
>>
>> There is no template assigned by default:
>> # tc chaintemplate show dev dummy0
On 6/28/18 7:08 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Create dummy device with clsact first:
> # ip link add type dummy
> # tc qdisc add dev dummy0 clsact
>
> There is no template assigned by default:
> # tc chaintemplate show dev dummy0 ingress
>
> Add a template of type flower allowing to insert rules
Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 03:54:17PM CEST, j...@mojatatu.com wrote:
>On 28/06/18 09:22 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 03:13:30PM CEST, j...@mojatatu.com wrote:
>> >
>> > On 26/06/18 03:59 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> > > From: Jiri Pirko
>> > >
>> > > For the TC clsact offload these days,
On 28/06/18 09:22 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 03:13:30PM CEST, j...@mojatatu.com wrote:
On 26/06/18 03:59 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
From: Jiri Pirko
For the TC clsact offload these days, some of HW drivers need
to hold a magic ball. The reason is, with the first inserted rule
Oh, this is v3 already. The changelog should be:
---
v2->v3:
- patch 5:
- rebase on top of the reoffload pathset
- patch 6:
- rebase on top of the reoffload pathset
- patch 9:
- adjust to the userspace cmdline changes
v1->v2:
- patch 6:
- remove leftover extack arg in fl_hw_create_tmplt()
Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 03:13:30PM CEST, j...@mojatatu.com wrote:
>
>On 26/06/18 03:59 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> From: Jiri Pirko
>>
>> For the TC clsact offload these days, some of HW drivers need
>> to hold a magic ball. The reason is, with the first inserted rule inside
>> HW they need to guess
On 26/06/18 03:59 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
From: Jiri Pirko
For the TC clsact offload these days, some of HW drivers need
to hold a magic ball. The reason is, with the first inserted rule inside
HW they need to guess what fields will be used for the matching. If
later on this guess proves to be
From: Jiri Pirko
For the TC clsact offload these days, some of HW drivers need
to hold a magic ball. The reason is, with the first inserted rule inside
HW they need to guess what fields will be used for the matching. If
later on this guess proves to be wrong and user adds a filter with a
Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 06:48:26AM CEST, da...@davemloft.net wrote:
>From: Jiri Pirko
>Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 09:59:51 +0200
>
>> For the TC clsact offload these days, some of HW drivers need
>> to hold a magic ball. The reason is, with the first inserted rule inside
>> HW they need to guess what
From: Jiri Pirko
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 09:59:51 +0200
> For the TC clsact offload these days, some of HW drivers need
> to hold a magic ball. The reason is, with the first inserted rule inside
> HW they need to guess what fields will be used for the matching. If
> later on this guess proves to
Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 08:34:46AM CEST, sridhar.samudr...@intel.com wrote:
>
>On 6/26/2018 11:05 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 02:04:31AM CEST, xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 1:01 AM Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> > > Create dummy device with clsact first:
>> > >
On 6/26/2018 11:05 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 02:04:31AM CEST, xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 1:01 AM Jiri Pirko wrote:
Create dummy device with clsact first:
# ip link add type dummy
# tc qdisc add dev dummy0 clsact
There is no template assigned by
Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 02:04:31AM CEST, xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com wrote:
>On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 1:01 AM Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Create dummy device with clsact first:
>> # ip link add type dummy
>> # tc qdisc add dev dummy0 clsact
>>
>> There is no template assigned by default:
>> # tc filter
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 1:01 AM Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Create dummy device with clsact first:
> # ip link add type dummy
> # tc qdisc add dev dummy0 clsact
>
> There is no template assigned by default:
> # tc filter template show dev dummy0 ingress
>
> Add a template of type flower allowing to
From: Jiri Pirko
For the TC clsact offload these days, some of HW drivers need
to hold a magic ball. The reason is, with the first inserted rule inside
HW they need to guess what fields will be used for the matching. If
later on this guess proves to be wrong and user adds a filter with a
31 matches
Mail list logo
