Re: NAPI poll behavior in various Intel drivers

2008-01-07 Thread Jarek Poplawski
On 04-01-2008 12:40, David Miller wrote: ... That tx_cleaned thing clouds the logic in all of these driver's poll routines. The one necessary precondition is that when work_done budget we exit polling and return a value less than budget. If the -poll() returns a value less than budget,

Re: NAPI poll behavior in various Intel drivers

2008-01-05 Thread Andi Kleen
David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: From: James Chapman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2008 00:18:31 + David Miller wrote: From: James Chapman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2008 20:10:30 + With the latest NAPI, this code has to change. But rather than remove

Re: NAPI poll behavior in various Intel drivers

2008-01-05 Thread David Miller
From: Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2008 14:29:05 +0100 In 2.4 we used to have (haven't checked recently) performance regressions with NAPI vs non NAPI (or versus the old BCM vendor driver) on tg3 for some workloads that didn't fully fill the link. The theory was always that

NAPI poll behavior in various Intel drivers

2008-01-04 Thread David Miller
Several Intel networking drivers such as e1000, e1000e and e100 all do this to exit NAPI polling: if ((!tx_cleaned (work_done == 0)) || !netif_running(poll_dev)) { I tried to make this use in the NAPI rework: if ((!tx_cleaned (work_done budget)) ||

Re: NAPI poll behavior in various Intel drivers

2008-01-04 Thread James Chapman
David Miller wrote: Several Intel networking drivers such as e1000, e1000e and e100 all do this to exit NAPI polling: if ((!tx_cleaned (work_done == 0)) || !netif_running(poll_dev)) { I tried to make this use in the NAPI rework: if ((!tx_cleaned (work_done

Re: NAPI poll behavior in various Intel drivers

2008-01-04 Thread David Miller
From: James Chapman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2008 20:10:30 + With the latest NAPI, this code has to change. But rather than remove the tx_cleaned logic completely, shouldn't transmit processing be included in the work_done accounting when a driver does transmit cleanup

Re: NAPI poll behavior in various Intel drivers

2008-01-04 Thread James Chapman
David Miller wrote: From: James Chapman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2008 20:10:30 + With the latest NAPI, this code has to change. But rather than remove the tx_cleaned logic completely, shouldn't transmit processing be included in the work_done accounting when a driver does

Re: NAPI poll behavior in various Intel drivers

2008-01-04 Thread David Miller
From: James Chapman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2008 00:18:31 + David Miller wrote: From: James Chapman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2008 20:10:30 + With the latest NAPI, this code has to change. But rather than remove the tx_cleaned logic completely, shouldn't