On 7/20/2016 1:13 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 7:37 PM, Casey Schaufler
> wrote:
>> Digging into this further I have determined that the
>> circumstances leading to this issue are somewhat complex.
>> The good news is that there seems to be a very
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 7:37 PM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> Digging into this further I have determined that the
> circumstances leading to this issue are somewhat complex.
> The good news is that there seems to be a very limited
> circumstances under which the problem
On 7/6/2016 11:56 AM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> On 7/6/2016 11:43 AM, David Ahern wrote:
>> On 7/6/16 11:01 AM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
>>> I find the test occasionally passes without hanging, but will
>>> hang the system if repeated. I am running on Ubuntu and Fedora,
>>> both with systemd, which
On 7/6/2016 11:43 AM, David Ahern wrote:
> On 7/6/16 11:01 AM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
>> I find the test occasionally passes without hanging, but will
>> hang the system if repeated. I am running on Ubuntu and Fedora,
>> both with systemd, which may be a contributing factor. I run
>> under qemu,
On 7/6/16 11:01 AM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
I find the test occasionally passes without hanging, but will
hang the system if repeated. I am running on Ubuntu and Fedora,
both with systemd, which may be a contributing factor. I run
under qemu, and am based on Linus' tree.
With this:
for n in
On 7/6/2016 10:40 AM, David Ahern wrote:
> On 7/6/16 10:24 AM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
>> On 7/6/2016 9:28 AM, David Ahern wrote:
>>> On 7/5/16 6:31 PM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
On 7/5/2016 5:49 PM, David Ahern wrote:
> On 7/5/16 5:38 PM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
>> I have encountered a
On 7/6/16 10:24 AM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
On 7/6/2016 9:28 AM, David Ahern wrote:
On 7/5/16 6:31 PM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
On 7/5/2016 5:49 PM, David Ahern wrote:
On 7/5/16 5:38 PM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
I have encountered a system hang with my Smack
networking tests that bisects to the
On 7/6/2016 9:28 AM, David Ahern wrote:
> On 7/5/16 6:31 PM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
>> On 7/5/2016 5:49 PM, David Ahern wrote:
>>> On 7/5/16 5:38 PM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
I have encountered a system hang with my Smack
networking tests that bisects to the change below.
I can't say
On 7/5/16 6:31 PM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
On 7/5/2016 5:49 PM, David Ahern wrote:
On 7/5/16 5:38 PM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
I have encountered a system hang with my Smack
networking tests that bisects to the change below.
I can't say that I have any idea why the change
would impact the Smack
On 7/6/2016 7:03 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 8:38 PM, Casey Schaufler
>> wrote:
>>> I have encountered a system hang with my Smack
>>> networking tests that bisects to the change
On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> On 7/6/2016 5:50 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 8:38 PM, Casey Schaufler
>> wrote:
>>> I have encountered a system hang with my Smack
>>> networking tests that bisects to
On 7/6/2016 5:50 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 8:38 PM, Casey Schaufler
> wrote:
>> I have encountered a system hang with my Smack
>> networking tests that bisects to the change below.
>> I can't say that I have any idea why the change
>> would impact the
On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 8:38 PM, Casey Schaufler
> wrote:
>> I have encountered a system hang with my Smack
>> networking tests that bisects to the change below.
>> I can't say that I have any idea
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 8:38 PM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> I have encountered a system hang with my Smack
> networking tests that bisects to the change below.
> I can't say that I have any idea why the change
> would impact the Smack processing, but there appears
> to be
On 7/5/2016 5:49 PM, David Ahern wrote:
> On 7/5/16 5:38 PM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
>> I have encountered a system hang with my Smack
>> networking tests that bisects to the change below.
>> I can't say that I have any idea why the change
>> would impact the Smack processing, but there appears
>>
On 7/5/16 5:38 PM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
I have encountered a system hang with my Smack
networking tests that bisects to the change below.
I can't say that I have any idea why the change
would impact the Smack processing, but there appears
to be some serious packet processing going on. The
I have encountered a system hang with my Smack
networking tests that bisects to the change below.
I can't say that I have any idea why the change
would impact the Smack processing, but there appears
to be some serious packet processing going on. The
Smack code is using CIPSO on the loopback
17 matches
Mail list logo