Re: [PATCH 05/15] RDS: increase size of hash-table to 8K

2015-09-23 Thread santosh shilimkar
Hi Dave, On 9/21/2015 4:55 PM, santosh shilimkar wrote: On 9/21/2015 4:05 PM, David Miller wrote: From: Santosh Shilimkar Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2015 19:04:42 -0400 Even with per bucket locking scheme, in a massive parallel system with active rds sockets which could

Re: [PATCH 05/15] RDS: increase size of hash-table to 8K

2015-09-21 Thread David Miller
From: Santosh Shilimkar Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2015 19:04:42 -0400 > Even with per bucket locking scheme, in a massive parallel > system with active rds sockets which could be in excess of multiple > of 10K, rds_bin_lookup() workload is siginificant because of smaller >

Re: [PATCH 05/15] RDS: increase size of hash-table to 8K

2015-09-21 Thread santosh shilimkar
On 9/21/2015 4:05 PM, David Miller wrote: From: Santosh Shilimkar Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2015 19:04:42 -0400 Even with per bucket locking scheme, in a massive parallel system with active rds sockets which could be in excess of multiple of 10K, rds_bin_lookup()

Re: [PATCH 05/15] RDS: increase size of hash-table to 8K

2015-09-21 Thread santosh shilimkar
On 9/21/2015 1:31 AM, David Laight wrote: From: Santosh Shilimkar Sent: 20 September 2015 00:05 Even with per bucket locking scheme, in a massive parallel system with active rds sockets which could be in excess of multiple of 10K, rds_bin_lookup() workload is significant because of smaller

RE: [PATCH 05/15] RDS: increase size of hash-table to 8K

2015-09-21 Thread David Laight
From: Santosh Shilimkar > Sent: 20 September 2015 00:05 > Even with per bucket locking scheme, in a massive parallel > system with active rds sockets which could be in excess of multiple > of 10K, rds_bin_lookup() workload is siginificant because of smaller > hashtable size. > > With some tests,