On 03/09/2017 10:26 AM, Reshetova, Elena wrote:
>
>> On 03/09/2017 08:18 AM, Reshetova, Elena wrote:
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 04:21:09PM +0200, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
> used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
> a
> On 03/09/2017 08:18 AM, Reshetova, Elena wrote:
> >> On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 04:21:09PM +0200, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> >>> refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
> >>> used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
> >>> a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
>
On 03/09/2017 08:18 AM, Reshetova, Elena wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 04:21:09PM +0200, Elena Reshetova wrote:
>>> refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
>>> used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
>>> a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
>>> refcounter
> On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 04:21:09PM +0200, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> > refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
> > used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
> > a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
> > refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
> >
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 04:21:09PM +0200, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
> used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
> a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
> refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
> situations.
>
