From: Santosh Shilimkar
> Sent: 30 September 2015 18:24
...
> This is being addressed by simply using per bucket rw lock which makes the
> locking simple and very efficient. The hash table size is still an issue and
> I plan to address it by using re-sizable hash tables as suggested on the list.
On 10/1/15 9:19 AM, David Laight wrote:
From: Santosh Shilimkar
Sent: 30 September 2015 18:24
...
This is being addressed by simply using per bucket rw lock which makes the
locking simple and very efficient. The hash table size is still an issue and
I plan to address it by using re-sizable
