From: Christian König
> Sent: 16 August 2017 09:32
> Am 16.08.2017 um 10:16 schrieb Jiri Pirko:
> > Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 09:49:07AM CEST, christian.koe...@amd.com wrote:
> >> Am 16.08.2017 um 04:12 schrieb Chris Mi:
...
> >>> - ret = idr_alloc(_minor_idr, bcd, 0, BSG_MAX_DEVS, GFP_KERNEL);
> >>> -
Am 16.08.2017 um 11:31 schrieb Jiri Pirko:
[SNIP]
I don't. It is an API change, maintainers of the individual drivers are
not expected to review the patches like this.
Yeah, completely agree.
If yes then it somehow makes sense to send the patch bit by bit, if no then
it doesn't seem to make
Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 10:55:56AM CEST, christian.koe...@amd.com wrote:
>Am 16.08.2017 um 10:39 schrieb Jiri Pirko:
>> Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 10:31:35AM CEST, christian.koe...@amd.com wrote:
>> > Am 16.08.2017 um 10:16 schrieb Jiri Pirko:
>> > > Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 09:49:07AM CEST,
Am 16.08.2017 um 10:39 schrieb Jiri Pirko:
Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 10:31:35AM CEST, christian.koe...@amd.com wrote:
Am 16.08.2017 um 10:16 schrieb Jiri Pirko:
Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 09:49:07AM CEST, christian.koe...@amd.com wrote:
Am 16.08.2017 um 04:12 schrieb Chris Mi:
Using current TC code, it
Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 10:31:35AM CEST, christian.koe...@amd.com wrote:
>Am 16.08.2017 um 10:16 schrieb Jiri Pirko:
>> Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 09:49:07AM CEST, christian.koe...@amd.com wrote:
>> > Am 16.08.2017 um 04:12 schrieb Chris Mi:
>> > > Using current TC code, it is very slow to insert a lot of
Am 16.08.2017 um 10:16 schrieb Jiri Pirko:
Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 09:49:07AM CEST, christian.koe...@amd.com wrote:
Am 16.08.2017 um 04:12 schrieb Chris Mi:
Using current TC code, it is very slow to insert a lot of rules.
In order to improve the rules update rate in TC,
we introduced the
Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 09:49:07AM CEST, christian.koe...@amd.com wrote:
>Am 16.08.2017 um 04:12 schrieb Chris Mi:
>> Using current TC code, it is very slow to insert a lot of rules.
>>
>> In order to improve the rules update rate in TC,
>> we introduced the following two changes:
>> 1)
, 2017 11:06 AM
> To: Chris Mi <chr...@mellanox.com>
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [patch net-next 0/3] net/sched: Improve getting objects by
> indexes
>
>
> The CC: list you used for these postings was way too large.
>
> Seriously, netdev by itsel
The CC: list you used for these postings was way too large.
Seriously, netdev by itself or with one or two _specific_ developers
added would have been more than sufficient.
If you are automating things using the MAINTAINERS file, always
look over the result by hand and ask yourself "Do I really
