Hi David,
On 6/25/07, David Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok I have tried it on a Pentium-M ( 32 Bit ,) with 512 MB RAM and Core
2 Duo with 1Gig RAM ( running SMP kernel , 2 CPUS) with same results.
Cant go more than ~4K addresses. I have tried them with vanilla and
custom kernels all 2.6
Ok I have tried it on a Pentium-M ( 32 Bit ,) with 512 MB RAM and Core
2 Duo with 1Gig RAM ( running SMP kernel , 2 CPUS) with same results.
Cant go more than ~4K addresses. I have tried them with vanilla and
custom kernels all 2.6.19+ versions. Results are same on both systems ,
so thats th
On 6/25/07, Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jun 25 2007 12:41, Robert Iakobashvili wrote:
>> > I am getting after initial successes some errors:
>> > "rtnl_talk(): RTNETLINK answers: Cannot allocate memory"
>> > and
>> > #ip addr | wc-l is 8194.
>>
>> I'd be surprised if it was 4096
On Jun 25 2007 12:41, Robert Iakobashvili wrote:
>> > I am getting after initial successes some errors:
>> > "rtnl_talk(): RTNETLINK answers: Cannot allocate memory"
>> > and
>> > #ip addr | wc-l is 8194.
>>
>> I'd be surprised if it was 4096 on x86 and 8192 on x86_64...
>
> Missed to mention: the
Hi
On 6/25/07, Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jun 25 2007 11:47, Robert Iakobashvili wrote:
>
> I am getting after initial successes some errors:
> "rtnl_talk(): RTNETLINK answers: Cannot allocate memory"
> and
> #ip addr | wc-l is 8194.
I'd be surprised if it was 4096 on x86 and
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Jun 24 2007 15:08, Kyle Moffett wrote:
>
>>Do you really need that many IP addresses? When somebody finally gets
>>around to implementing REDIRECT support for ip6tables then you could
>>just redirect them all to the same port on the local system.
>
>
> The way I see i
On Jun 25 2007 11:47, Robert Iakobashvili wrote:
>
> I am getting after initial successes some errors:
> "rtnl_talk(): RTNETLINK answers: Cannot allocate memory"
> and
> #ip addr | wc-l is 8194.
I'd be surprised if it was 4096 on x86 and 8192 on x86_64...
Jan
--
-
To unsubscribe from t
David,
On 6/25/07, David Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > I am trying to add multiple IP addresses ( v6 ) to my FC7 box on eth0.
>> > But I am hitting a max limit of 4000 IP address . Seems like there
>> is a
>> > limiting variable in linux kernel (which one? ) that prevents from
>> > addi
Robert Iakobashvili wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 12:20:01 -0500 David Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I am trying to add multiple IP addresses ( v6 ) to my FC7 box on eth0.
> But I am hitting a max limit of 4000 IP address . Seems like there
is a
> limiting variable in linux kernel (w
On Jun 24, 2007, at 15:58:54, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Jun 24 2007 15:08, Kyle Moffett wrote:
Do you really need that many IP addresses? When somebody finally
gets around to implementing REDIRECT support for ip6tables then
you could just redirect them all to the same port on the local
syst
On Jun 24 2007 13:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> On Jun 24 2007 15:08, Kyle Moffett wrote:
>> >
>> > Do you really need that many IP addresses? When somebody finally gets
>> > around to implementing REDIRECT support for ip6tables then you could
>> > just redirect them all to the same port on the
On Sun, 24 Jun 2007, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Jun 24 2007 15:08, Kyle Moffett wrote:
Do you really need that many IP addresses? When somebody finally gets
around to implementing REDIRECT support for ip6tables then you could
just redirect them all to the same port on the local system.
The w
On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 12:20:01 -0500 David Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am trying to add multiple IP addresses ( v6 ) to my FC7 box on eth0.
> But I am hitting a max limit of 4000 IP address . Seems like there is a
> limiting variable in linux kernel (which one? ) that prevents from
> adding
Hi,
On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 12:20:01 -0500 David Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am trying to add multiple IP addresses ( v6 ) to my FC7 box on eth0.
> But I am hitting a max limit of 4000 IP address . Seems like there is a
> limiting variable in linux kernel (which one? ) that prevents from
On Jun 24 2007 15:08, Kyle Moffett wrote:
>
> Do you really need that many IP addresses? When somebody finally gets
> around to implementing REDIRECT support for ip6tables then you could
> just redirect them all to the same port on the local system.
The way I see it, it's: "if someone gets aroun
>
> I keep having hopeful dreams that one day netfilter will grow support
> for cross-protocol NAT (IE: NAT a TCPv4 connection over TCPv6 to the
> IPv6-only local web server, or vice versa). It would seem that would
> require a merged "xtables" program.
You don't actually need it (at
On Jun 24, 2007, at 13:20:01, David Jones wrote:
Hi, I am trying to add multiple IP addresses ( v6 ) to my FC7 box
on eth0. But I am hitting a max limit of 4000 IP address . Seems
like there is a limiting variable in linux kernel (which one? )
that prevents from adding more IP addresses than
On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 12:20:01 -0500 David Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I am trying to add multiple IP addresses ( v6 ) to my FC7 box on eth0.
> But I am hitting a max limit of 4000 IP address . Seems like there is a
> limiting variable in linux kernel (which one? ) that prevents from
18 matches
Mail list logo
