[patch 01/41] e100: disable interrupts at boot

2006-08-15 Thread akpm
-off-by: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- drivers/pci/quirks.c | 57 + 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+) diff -puN drivers/pci/quirks.c~e100-disable-interrupts-at-boot drivers/pci/quirks.c --- a/drivers/pci/quirks.c~e100-disable-interrupts-at-boot

[patch 5/8] e100: disable interrupts at boot

2006-06-08 Thread akpm
-off-by: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- drivers/pci/quirks.c | 57 + 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+) diff -puN drivers/pci/quirks.c~e100-disable-interrupts-at-boot drivers/pci/quirks.c --- devel/drivers/pci/quirks.c~e100-disable-interrupts-at-boot

[patch 7/9] e100: disable interrupts at boot

2006-04-27 Thread akpm
-off-by: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- drivers/pci/quirks.c | 57 + 1 files changed, 57 insertions(+) diff -puN drivers/pci/quirks.c~e100-disable-interrupts-at-boot drivers/pci/quirks.c --- devel/drivers/pci/quirks.c~e100-disable-interrupts-at-boot

Re: [patch 7/9] e100: disable interrupts at boot

2006-04-27 Thread Jeff Garzik
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Bjorn Helgaas [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apparently the Intel PRO/100 device enables interrupts on reset. Unless firmware explicitly disables PRO/100 interrupts, we can get a flood of interrupts when a driver attaches to an unrelated device that happens to share the

Re: [patch 7/9] e100: disable interrupts at boot

2006-04-27 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Thursday 27 April 2006 04:00, Jeff Garzik wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Bjorn Helgaas [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apparently the Intel PRO/100 device enables interrupts on reset. Unless firmware explicitly disables PRO/100 interrupts, we can get a flood of interrupts when a driver

[patch 06/10] e100: disable interrupts at boot

2006-04-18 Thread akpm
-off-by: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- drivers/pci/quirks.c | 57 + 1 files changed, 57 insertions(+) diff -puN drivers/pci/quirks.c~e100-disable-interrupts-at-boot drivers/pci/quirks.c --- devel/drivers/pci/quirks.c~e100-disable-interrupts-at-boot

Re: e100: disable interrupts at boot

2006-04-06 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
On 4/5/06, David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Roland Dreier [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2006 14:52:24 -0700 + case 0x1030 ... 0x1034: Do we use the gcc case range extension in the kernel? (This is an honest question -- I don't think I've seen it used anywhere,

e100: disable interrupts at boot

2006-04-05 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
Apparently the Intel PRO/100 device enables interrupts on reset. Unless firmware explicitly disables PRO/100 interrupts, we can get a flood of interrupts when a driver attaches to an unrelated device that happens to share the PRO/100 IRQ. This should resolve this irq 11: nobody cared bug report:

Re: e100: disable interrupts at boot

2006-04-05 Thread Roland Dreier
+case 0x1030 ... 0x1034: Do we use the gcc case range extension in the kernel? (This is an honest question -- I don't think I've seen it used anywhere, and I'd be curious to know what the taste arbiters think of it) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in the

Re: e100: disable interrupts at boot

2006-04-05 Thread Auke Kok
Roland Dreier wrote: + case 0x1030 ... 0x1034: Do we use the gcc case range extension in the kernel? (This is an honest question -- I don't think I've seen it used anywhere, and I'd be curious to know what the taste arbiters think of it) I'm not a fan of it either but it is used already in

Re: e100: disable interrupts at boot

2006-04-05 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Wednesday 05 April 2006 15:52, Roland Dreier wrote: + case 0x1030 ... 0x1034: Do we use the gcc case range extension in the kernel? (This is an honest question -- I don't think I've seen it used anywhere, and I'd be curious to know what the taste arbiters think of it) There are a

Re: e100: disable interrupts at boot

2006-04-05 Thread David S. Miller
From: Roland Dreier [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2006 14:52:24 -0700 + case 0x1030 ... 0x1034: Do we use the gcc case range extension in the kernel? (This is an honest question -- I don't think I've seen it used anywhere, and I'd be curious to know what the taste arbiters think