.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Dave Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2007 6:05 PM
To: Kok, Auke
Cc: David Mack; Herbert Xu; netdev@vger.kernel.org;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: e100 problems in .23rc8 ?
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 10:59:59AM -0700, Kok
On 10/18/2007 01:59 PM, Kok, Auke wrote:
David Mack wrote:
It appears that the needed e100 fix made it into the Fedora
2.6.23.1-23.fc8 kernel. Boots reliably now.
Huge thanks and great work, guys.
DaveJ, I didn't push anything upstream. Can you verify this now works?
One of our users
David Mack wrote:
Then I got very, very lucky, since I have successfully rebooted
2.6.23.1-23.fc8 four times (zero panics) and this is the first time a
2.6.23 kernel has not panicked on me in months.
This does not fill me with confidence in the theory that the panics I've
been seeing are
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 10:59:59AM -0700, Kok, Auke wrote:
David Mack wrote:
It appears that the needed e100 fix made it into the Fedora
2.6.23.1-23.fc8 kernel. Boots reliably now.
Huge thanks and great work, guys.
DaveJ, I didn't push anything upstream. Can you verify this now
On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 09:04:40PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
I included the patch below in the latest build, but I've not had
chance to try it on an e100 box yet..
Looks good to me. Thanks Dave!
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmVHI~} [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home
Jones; netdev@vger.kernel.org;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: e100 problems in .23rc8 ?
Herbert Xu wrote:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 07:54:33AM -0700, David Mack wrote:
Still no joy here. See attached capture. What's really
weird is that it
shows *two* kernel panics, one in e100_poll
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 10:05 AM
To: Herbert Xu
Cc: David Mack; Dave Jones; netdev@vger.kernel.org;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: e100 problems in .23rc8 ?
Herbert Xu wrote:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 07:54:33AM -0700, David Mack wrote:
Still no joy here. See
On 10/18/2007 01:59 PM, Kok, Auke wrote:
David Mack wrote:
It appears that the needed e100 fix made it into the Fedora
2.6.23.1-23.fc8 kernel. Boots reliably now.
Huge thanks and great work, guys.
DaveJ, I didn't push anything upstream. Can you verify this now works?
We didn't put
Herbert Xu wrote:
David Mack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I understand the message Dave Jones sent yesterday, the patch you
mention *was* applied to the e100 driver in 2.6.23-6.fc8?
Nope, he applied a different one which doesn't have the crucial
part to disable NAPI polls before
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 09:33:15AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
Hm... running 2.6.23-6.fc8, I've been through 30+ reboot cycles without
a problem. Before, I'd oops every 5 or so times I booted...
I now have another NIC in the box, disabled; I don't think that should
be affecting anything?
Herbert Xu wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 09:33:15AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
Hm... running 2.6.23-6.fc8, I've been through 30+ reboot cycles without
a problem. Before, I'd oops every 5 or so times I booted...
I now have another NIC in the box, disabled; I don't think that should
be
To: Eric Sandeen
Cc: David Mack; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: e100 problems in .23rc8 ?
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 09:33:15AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
Hm... running 2.6.23-6.fc8, I've been through 30+ reboot
cycles without
a problem
@vger.kernel.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: e100 problems in .23rc8 ?
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 07:54:33AM -0700, David Mack wrote:
Still no joy here. See attached capture. What's really
weird is that it
shows *two* kernel panics, one in e100_poll and one in _list_add.
Yes that's
Herbert Xu wrote:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 07:54:33AM -0700, David Mack wrote:
Still no joy here. See attached capture. What's really weird is that it
shows *two* kernel panics, one in e100_poll and one in _list_add.
Yes that's the symptom one would expect from that bug. We really
need to
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 07:54:33AM -0700, David Mack wrote:
Still no joy here. See attached capture. What's really weird is that it
shows *two* kernel panics, one in e100_poll and one in _list_add.
Yes that's the symptom one would expect from that bug. We really
need to apply the same fix
; netdev@vger.kernel.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
David Mack
Subject: Re: e100 problems in .23rc8 ?
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 09:10:34AM -0700, Kok, Auke wrote:
Herbert Xu wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 08:36:38PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
The e1000 changes you reference above
David Mack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I understand the message Dave Jones sent yesterday, the patch you
mention *was* applied to the e100 driver in 2.6.23-6.fc8?
Nope, he applied a different one which doesn't have the crucial
part to disable NAPI polls before registration.
Cheers,
--
Visit
Herbert Xu wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 08:36:38PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
The e1000 changes you reference above, is this the changeset you mean?
commit 416b5d10afdc797c21c457ade3714e8f2f75edd9
Author: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri Jun 1 10:22:39 2007 -0700
e1000: disable
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 09:10:34AM -0700, Kok, Auke wrote:
Herbert Xu wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 08:36:38PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
The e1000 changes you reference above, is this the changeset you mean?
commit 416b5d10afdc797c21c457ade3714e8f2f75edd9
Author: Auke Kok [EMAIL
Eric/David, the Fedora 8 RPM version 2.6.23-6.fc8 will have this if you
want to give it a shot too. It'll be at
http://people.redhat.com/davej/kernels/Fedora/f7.92/ when it's done
building in an hour or so.
Dave
Thanks, I'll give it a whirl this evening. I put a new net card in that
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 09:10:34AM -0700, Kok, Auke wrote:
commit 416b5d10afdc797c21c457ade3714e8f2f75edd9
Author: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri Jun 1 10:22:39 2007 -0700
e1000: disable polling before registering netdevice
this patch actually called napi_disable() in
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 02:58:27PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
Kok, Auke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave Jones wrote:
Last night, I hit this bug during boot up..
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/junk/e100-2.jpg
This morning, I got a mail from a Fedora user of the same
.23-rc8 based
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 08:36:38PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
The e1000 changes you reference above, is this the changeset you mean?
commit 416b5d10afdc797c21c457ade3714e8f2f75edd9
Author: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri Jun 1 10:22:39 2007 -0700
e1000: disable polling before
Kok, Auke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave Jones wrote:
Last night, I hit this bug during boot up..
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/junk/e100-2.jpg
This morning, I got a mail from a Fedora user of the same
.23-rc8 based kernel that has seen a different trace
also implicating e100..
Last night, I hit this bug during boot up..
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/junk/e100-2.jpg
This morning, I got a mail from a Fedora user of the same
.23-rc8 based kernel that has seen a different trace
also implicating e100..
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/junk/e100.jpg
It may be that the two
Dave Jones wrote:
Last night, I hit this bug during boot up..
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/junk/e100-2.jpg
This morning, I got a mail from a Fedora user of the same
.23-rc8 based kernel that has seen a different trace
also implicating e100..
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/junk/e100.jpg
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 11:10:11AM -0700, Kok, Auke wrote:
Dave Jones wrote:
Last night, I hit this bug during boot up..
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/junk/e100-2.jpg
This morning, I got a mail from a Fedora user of the same
.23-rc8 based kernel that has seen a different trace
27 matches
Mail list logo
