Re: kTLS in combination with mlx4 is very unstable

2018-05-01 Thread Andre Tomt
On 01. mai 2018 18:09, Dave Watson wrote: On 04/24/18 10:01 AM, Dave Watson wrote: On 04/22/18 11:21 PM, Andre Tomt wrote: The kernel seems to get increasingly unstable as I load it up with client connections. At about 9Gbps and 700 connections, it is okay at least for a while - it might run

Re: kTLS in combination with mlx4 is very unstable

2018-05-01 Thread Dave Watson
Hi Andre, On 04/24/18 10:01 AM, Dave Watson wrote: > On 04/22/18 11:21 PM, Andre Tomt wrote: > > The kernel seems to get increasingly unstable as I load it up with client > > connections. At about 9Gbps and 700 connections, it is okay at least for a > > while - it might run fine for say 45

Re: kTLS in combination with mlx4 is very unstable

2018-04-24 Thread Dave Watson
On 04/22/18 11:21 PM, Andre Tomt wrote: > kTLS looks fun, so I decided to play with it. It is quite spiffy - however > with mlx4 I get kernel crashes I'm not seeing when testing on ixgbe. > > For testing I'm using a git build of the "stream reflector" cubemap[1] > configured with kTLS and 8

Re: kTLS in combination with mlx4 is very unstable

2018-04-23 Thread Andre Tomt
On 22. april 2018 23:21, Andre Tomt wrote: Hello! kTLS looks fun, so I decided to play with it. It is quite spiffy - however with mlx4 I get kernel crashes I'm not seeing when testing on ixgbe. For testing I'm using a git build of the "stream reflector" cubemap[1] configured with kTLS and

kTLS in combination with mlx4 is very unstable

2018-04-22 Thread Andre Tomt
Hello! kTLS looks fun, so I decided to play with it. It is quite spiffy - however with mlx4 I get kernel crashes I'm not seeing when testing on ixgbe. For testing I'm using a git build of the "stream reflector" cubemap[1] configured with kTLS and 8 worker threads running on 4 physical cores,