From: Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 23:14:49 +0100 (MET)
> People really depend on this. Much more than than pid/comm/smpunsafe stuff.
> For example, a web server [cgi enabled, etc.] which also runs squid,
> to force all webtraffic through it:
>
> -A OUTPUT -p tcp --dp
>> >> The report below was posted on the netfilter user list. Isn't there any
>> >> ill side effect by reverting the change?
>> >
>> >Performance regression :-(
>> >
>> >This optimization saves a whole handful of heavy atomic operations in
>> >the packet transmit path of TCP.
>> >
>> >As I unders
From: Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 22:07:07 +0100 (MET)
>
> >> The report below was posted on the netfilter user list. Isn't there any
> >> ill side effect by reverting the change?
> >
> >Performance regression :-(
> >
> >This optimization saves a whole handful of he
>> The report below was posted on the netfilter user list. Isn't there any
>> ill side effect by reverting the change?
>
>Performance regression :-(
>
>This optimization saves a whole handful of heavy atomic operations in
>the packet transmit path of TCP.
>
>As I understand it, the owner-Match is
From: Jozsef Kadlecsik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 21:31:56 +0100 (CET)
> The report below was posted on the netfilter user list. Isn't there any
> ill side effect by reverting the change?
Performance regression :-(
This optimization saves a whole handful of heavy atomic operatio
